Propose a change

The Statutory Neonatal Care Pay (General) Regulations 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

18 Continuous employment and stoppages of work

(1) Where a person does not work for any week or part of a week because there is a stoppage of work at that person’s place of employment due to a trade dispute within the meaning of section 35(1) of the Jobseekers Act 1995 then— (a) that person’s continuity of employment is treated as continuing throughout the stoppage for the purposes of section 171ZZ16 of the 1992 Act, and (b) no such week counts in the computation of their period of continuous employment. (2) Where during the stoppage of work a person is dismissed from their employment, that person’s continuity of employment is not to be treated under paragraph (1) as continuing beyond the commencement of the day that person stopped work. (3) Paragraph (1)(b) and paragraph (2) do not apply to a person who proves that at no time did they have a direct interest in the trade dispute in question.

Your change, as a redline

18 Continuous employment and stoppages of work

(1) Where a person does not work for any week or part of a week because there is a stoppage of work at that person’s place of employment due to a trade dispute within the meaning of section 35(1) of the Jobseekers Act 1995 then— (a) that person’s continuity of employment is treated as continuing throughout the stoppage for the purposes of section 171ZZ16 of the 1992 Act, and (b) no such week counts in the computation of their period of continuous employment. (2) Where during the stoppage of work a person is dismissed from their employment, that person’s continuity of employment is not to be treated under paragraph (1) as continuing beyond the commencement of the day that person stopped work. (3) Paragraph (1)(b) and paragraph (2) do not apply to a person who proves that at no time did they have a direct interest in the trade dispute in question.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds