Propose a change

Education Act 1993 (repealed)

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

202 Education supervision orders.

(1) Before instituting proceedings for an offence under section 198 or 199 of this Act, a local education authority shall consider whether it would be appropriate (instead of or as well as instituting the proceedings) to apply for an education supervision order with respect to the child. (2) The court— (a) by which a person is convicted of an offence under section 198 of this Act, or (b) before which a person is charged with an offence under section 199 of this Act, may direct the local education authority instituting the proceedings to apply for an education supervision order with respect to the child unless the authority, having consulted the appropriate local authority, decide that the child’s welfare will be satisfactorily safeguarded even though no education supervision order is made. (3) Where, following such a direction, a local education authority decide not to apply for an education supervision order they shall inform the court of the reasons for their decision. (4) Unless the court has directed otherwise, the information required under subsection (3) above shall be given to the court before the end of the period of eight weeks beginning with the date on which the direction was given. (5) Where— (a) a local education authority apply for an education supervision order with respect to a child who is the subject of a school attendance order, and (b) the court decides that section 36(3) of the Children Act 1989 (education supervision orders) prevents it from making the order, the court may direct that the school attendance order shall cease to be in force. (6) In this section— “appropriate local authority” has the same meaning as in section 36(9) of the Children Act 1989, and “education supervision order” means an education supervision order under that Act.

Your change, as a redline

202 Education supervision orders.

(1) Before instituting proceedings for an offence under section 198 or 199 of this Act, a local education authority shall consider whether it would be appropriate (instead of or as well as instituting the proceedings) to apply for an education supervision order with respect to the child. (2) The court— (a) by which a person is convicted of an offence under section 198 of this Act, or (b) before which a person is charged with an offence under section 199 of this Act, may direct the local education authority instituting the proceedings to apply for an education supervision order with respect to the child unless the authority, having consulted the appropriate local authority, decide that the child’s welfare will be satisfactorily safeguarded even though no education supervision order is made. (3) Where, following such a direction, a local education authority decide not to apply for an education supervision order they shall inform the court of the reasons for their decision. (4) Unless the court has directed otherwise, the information required under subsection (3) above shall be given to the court before the end of the period of eight weeks beginning with the date on which the direction was given. (5) Where— (a) a local education authority apply for an education supervision order with respect to a child who is the subject of a school attendance order, and (b) the court decides that section 36(3) of the Children Act 1989 (education supervision orders) prevents it from making the order, the court may direct that the school attendance order shall cease to be in force. (6) In this section— “appropriate local authority” has the same meaning as in section 36(9) of the Children Act 1989, and “education supervision order” means an education supervision order under that Act.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds