Data Protection Act 1984 (repealed 1.3.2000)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
28 Crime and taxation.
(1) Personal data held for any of the following puposes— (a) the prevention or detection of crime; (b) the apprehension or prosecution of offenders; or (c) the assessment or collection of any tax or duty, are exempt from the subject access provisions in any case in which the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to prejudice any of the matters mentioned in this sub-section. (2) Personal data which— (a) are held for the purpose of discharging statutory functions; and (b) consist of information obtained for such a purpose from a person who had it in his possession for any of the purposes mentioned in subsection (1) above, are exempt from the subject access provisions to the same extent as personal data held for any of the purposes mentioned in that subsection. (3) Personal data are exempt from the non-disclosure provisions in any case in which— (a) the disclosure is for any of the purposes mentioned in subsection (1) above; and (b) the application of those provisions in relation to the disclosure would be likely to prejudice any of the matters mentioned in that subsection; and in proceedings against any person for contravening a provision mentioned in section 26(3)(a) above or for an offence under section 5(6) above it shall be a defence to prove that he had reasonable grounds for believing that failure to make or (in the case of section 5(6)) to procure the disclosure in question would have been likely to prejudice any of those matters. (4) Personal data are exempt from the provisions of Part II of this Act conferring powers on the Registrar, to the extent to which they are exercisable by reference to the first data protection principle, in any case in which the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to prejudice any of the matters mentioned in subsection (1) above.
28 Crime and taxation.
(1) Personal data held for any of the following puposes— (a) the prevention or detection of crime; (b) the apprehension or prosecution of offenders; or (c) the assessment or collection of any tax or duty, are exempt from the subject access provisions in any case in which the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to prejudice any of the matters mentioned in this sub-section. (2) Personal data which— (a) are held for the purpose of discharging statutory functions; and (b) consist of information obtained for such a purpose from a person who had it in his possession for any of the purposes mentioned in subsection (1) above, are exempt from the subject access provisions to the same extent as personal data held for any of the purposes mentioned in that subsection. (3) Personal data are exempt from the non-disclosure provisions in any case in which— (a) the disclosure is for any of the purposes mentioned in subsection (1) above; and (b) the application of those provisions in relation to the disclosure would be likely to prejudice any of the matters mentioned in that subsection; and in proceedings against any person for contravening a provision mentioned in section 26(3)(a) above or for an offence under section 5(6) above it shall be a defence to prove that he had reasonable grounds for believing that failure to make or (in the case of section 5(6)) to procure the disclosure in question would have been likely to prejudice any of those matters. (4) Personal data are exempt from the provisions of Part II of this Act conferring powers on the Registrar, to the extent to which they are exercisable by reference to the first data protection principle, in any case in which the application of those provisions to the data would be likely to prejudice any of the matters mentioned in subsection (1) above.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.