The M60/M62/M66 Simister Island Interchange Development Consent (Correction) Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Schedule Correctable Errors
Article 2 (1) Where the correction is to be made | (2) How the correction is to be made | (3) Text to be substituted, inserted or omitted Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 12(1) | For “the authorised development”, substitute | “Work Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11” Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 12 (1) | For “footpath”, substitute | “path” Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 12(2) | After “details of improvements to the path”, insert | “within the Order land” Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 12(3) | For “bringing into use the authorised development”, substitute | “bringing into use Work Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11”
Schedule Correctable Errors
Article 2 (1) Where the correction is to be made | (2) How the correction is to be made | (3) Text to be substituted, inserted or omitted Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 12(1) | For “the authorised development”, substitute | “Work Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11” Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 12 (1) | For “footpath”, substitute | “path” Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 12(2) | After “details of improvements to the path”, insert | “within the Order land” Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 12(3) | For “bringing into use the authorised development”, substitute | “bringing into use Work Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11”
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.