Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
143 Increase in driving disqualification periods under certain existing orders: Scotland
(1) Subsection (2) applies where—
(a) a driving disqualification order was made in accordance with an extended disqualification provision,
(b) the sentence of imprisonment as a result of which the extended disqualification provision applied was imposed before the day on which section 142 came into force,
(c) section 1AB of the Prisoners and Criminal Proceedings (Scotland) Act 1993 applies to the offender in respect of the sentence (the offender, in particular, not having been released in respect of the sentence), and
(d) the appropriate extension period for the purposes of the order would have been longer had the sentence been imposed on the day on which section 142 came into force.
(2) The order has effect, on and after the day on which section 142 comes into force, as if the period of disqualification included an appropriate extension period of such length as it would have included had the sentence of imprisonment been imposed on that day.
(3) In this section—
“driving disqualification order” means an order under—
section 34 or 35 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (“the 1988 Act”), or
section 248 or 248A of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 (“the 1995 Act”);
“an extended disqualification provision” means—
section 35C of the 1988 Act (in the case of an order under section 34 or 35 of that Act), or
section 248D of the 1995 Act (in the case of an order under section 248 or 248A of the 1995 Act);
“appropriate extension period” and “sentence of imprisonment” are to be read in accordance with the extended disqualification provision concerned.
Your change, as a redline
143 Increase in driving disqualification periods under certain existing orders: Scotland
(1) Subsection (2) applies where—
(a) a driving disqualification order was made in accordance with an extended disqualification provision,
(b) the sentence of imprisonment as a result of which the extended disqualification provision applied was imposed before the day on which section 142 came into force,
(c) section 1AB of the Prisoners and Criminal Proceedings (Scotland) Act 1993 applies to the offender in respect of the sentence (the offender, in particular, not having been released in respect of the sentence), and
(d) the appropriate extension period for the purposes of the order would have been longer had the sentence been imposed on the day on which section 142 came into force.
(2) The order has effect, on and after the day on which section 142 comes into force, as if the period of disqualification included an appropriate extension period of such length as it would have included had the sentence of imprisonment been imposed on that day.
(3) In this section—
“driving disqualification order” means an order under—
section 34 or 35 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (“the 1988 Act”), or
section 248 or 248A of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 (“the 1995 Act”);
“an extended disqualification provision” means—
section 35C of the 1988 Act (in the case of an order under section 34 or 35 of that Act), or
section 248D of the 1995 Act (in the case of an order under section 248 or 248A of the 1995 Act);
“appropriate extension period” and “sentence of imprisonment” are to be read in accordance with the extended disqualification provision concerned.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.