Opticians Act 1989
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11B Failure to satisfy requirements imposed under a scheme
(1) If it appears to the registrar that a person has failed to satisfy requirements for continuing education and training imposed upon him under a scheme made by virtue of section 11A above, the registrar may— (a) remove from the appropriate register, or refuse to retain in the appropriate register, the registrant’s name; or (b) refuse to restore the person’s name to the appropriate register. (1A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1B) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) If it appears to the registrar that a person has failed to satisfy requirements for additional education and training imposed upon him under a scheme by virtue of section 11A(2)(e) above, the registrar may— (a) remove from the appropriate register, or refuse to retain in the appropriate register, the registrant’s entry relating to a specialty or proficiency; or (b) refuse to restore the registrant’s entry relating to a specialty or proficiency in the appropriate register. (3) The registrar must serve on any person whose name or entry he removes from, or whose name he refuses to retain in or restore to, the appropriate register under this section, notice of his decision and the reasons for it. (4) If the registrar exercises his powers under subsection (1) above, and the person whose name is removed from, or not retained in, or restored to, the appropriate register— (a) subsequently satisfies the registrar that he has met the requirements provided for under the scheme as to continuing education and training; and (b) meets the other requirements for registration, the registrar must restore his registration. (5) If the registrar exercises his powers under subsection (2) above, and the registrant whose entry relating to a specialty or proficiency is removed from, not retained in, or restored to, the appropriate register— (a) subsequently satisfies the registrar that he has now met the requirements for additional education and training; and (b) meets the other requirements for an entry relating to a specialty or proficiency set out in rules made in accordance with section 10(1A) above, the registrar must make the entry. (6) The Council may make rules as to the procedures to be followed before the registrar— (a) may refuse under this section— (i) to retain in the register the name of a person; or (ii) to retain in the register an entry relating to a specialty or proficiency; or (b) may make a decision whether or not to restore a person’s name to the appropriate register or to restore an entry relating to a proficiency or specialty in accordance with this section.
11B Failure to satisfy requirements imposed under a scheme
(1) If it appears to the registrar that a person has failed to satisfy requirements for continuing education and training imposed upon him under a scheme made by virtue of section 11A above, the registrar may— (a) remove from the appropriate register, or refuse to retain in the appropriate register, the registrant’s name; or (b) refuse to restore the person’s name to the appropriate register. (1A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1B) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) If it appears to the registrar that a person has failed to satisfy requirements for additional education and training imposed upon him under a scheme by virtue of section 11A(2)(e) above, the registrar may— (a) remove from the appropriate register, or refuse to retain in the appropriate register, the registrant’s entry relating to a specialty or proficiency; or (b) refuse to restore the registrant’s entry relating to a specialty or proficiency in the appropriate register. (3) The registrar must serve on any person whose name or entry he removes from, or whose name he refuses to retain in or restore to, the appropriate register under this section, notice of his decision and the reasons for it. (4) If the registrar exercises his powers under subsection (1) above, and the person whose name is removed from, or not retained in, or restored to, the appropriate register— (a) subsequently satisfies the registrar that he has met the requirements provided for under the scheme as to continuing education and training; and (b) meets the other requirements for registration, the registrar must restore his registration. (5) If the registrar exercises his powers under subsection (2) above, and the registrant whose entry relating to a specialty or proficiency is removed from, not retained in, or restored to, the appropriate register— (a) subsequently satisfies the registrar that he has now met the requirements for additional education and training; and (b) meets the other requirements for an entry relating to a specialty or proficiency set out in rules made in accordance with section 10(1A) above, the registrar must make the entry. (6) The Council may make rules as to the procedures to be followed before the registrar— (a) may refuse under this section— (i) to retain in the register the name of a person; or (ii) to retain in the register an entry relating to a specialty or proficiency; or (b) may make a decision whether or not to restore a person’s name to the appropriate register or to restore an entry relating to a proficiency or specialty in accordance with this section.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.