Opticians Act 1989
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
23B Procedure of Fitness to Practise Committee and Registration Appeals Committee
(1) For the purposes of proceedings under this Act in England and Wales or in Northern Ireland before— (a) the Fitness to Practise Committee; or (b) the Registration Appeals Committee, the Committee may administer oaths and any party to the proceedings may issue a writ of sub poena ad testificandum or duces tecum. (2) No person shall be compelled under any such writ to produce any document which he could not be compelled to produce on the trial of an action. (3) Section 36 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and section 67 of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 (subpoena issued in High Court to run through United Kingdom) shall apply in relation to any such proceedings in England and Wales and in Northern Ireland respectively as those provisions apply in relation to causes and matters in the High Court or, as the case may be, actions or suits pending in the High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland. (4) For the purposes of any such proceedings in Scotland, the Committee may administer oaths and the Court of Session shall on the application of any party to the proceedings have the like power as in any action in that court— (a) to grant warrant for the citation of witnesses and havers to give evidence or to produce documents before the Committee, and for the issue of letters of second diligence against any witness or havers failing to appear after due citation; (b) to grant warrant for the recovery of documents; and (c) to grant commissions to persons to take the evidence of witnesses or to examine havers and receive their exhibits and productions.
23B Procedure of Fitness to Practise Committee and Registration Appeals Committee
(1) For the purposes of proceedings under this Act in England and Wales or in Northern Ireland before— (a) the Fitness to Practise Committee; or (b) the Registration Appeals Committee, the Committee may administer oaths and any party to the proceedings may issue a writ of sub poena ad testificandum or duces tecum. (2) No person shall be compelled under any such writ to produce any document which he could not be compelled to produce on the trial of an action. (3) Section 36 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and section 67 of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 (subpoena issued in High Court to run through United Kingdom) shall apply in relation to any such proceedings in England and Wales and in Northern Ireland respectively as those provisions apply in relation to causes and matters in the High Court or, as the case may be, actions or suits pending in the High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland. (4) For the purposes of any such proceedings in Scotland, the Committee may administer oaths and the Court of Session shall on the application of any party to the proceedings have the like power as in any action in that court— (a) to grant warrant for the citation of witnesses and havers to give evidence or to produce documents before the Committee, and for the issue of letters of second diligence against any witness or havers failing to appear after due citation; (b) to grant warrant for the recovery of documents; and (c) to grant commissions to persons to take the evidence of witnesses or to examine havers and receive their exhibits and productions.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.