Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
101 Sections 98 and 100: matters to which NHS England must have regard
(1) In performing the duty under section 98(1) (ensuring sufficient skilled workers for the health service) or the duty under section 100(4) (setting objectives, priorities and outcomes for education and training), NHS England must have regard to the following matters in particular—
(a) the likely future demand for health services and for persons with the skills and training to work as health care workers for the purposes of the health service,
(b) the sustainability of the supply of persons with the skills and training to work as such,
(c) the priorities that providers of health services have for the education and training of persons wishing to work as such,
(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(e) the objectives of the Secretary of State in exercising public health functions (as defined by section 1H of that Act),
(f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(g) documents published by the Secretary of State under section 100(2) or (3),
(h) the desirability of promoting the integration of health provision with health-related provision and care and support provision,
(i) the desirability of enabling health care workers to switch between different posts relating to health provision, health-related provision or care and support provision, and
(j) such other matters as regulations may specify.
(2) In subsection (1)—
“health provision”, “health-related provision” and “care and support provision” each have the same meaning as in section 3;
“health services” means health services provided as part of the health service.
Your change, as a redline
101 Sections 98 and 100: matters to which NHS England must have regard
(1) In performing the duty under section 98(1) (ensuring sufficient skilled workers for the health service) or the duty under section 100(4) (setting objectives, priorities and outcomes for education and training), NHS England must have regard to the following matters in particular—
(a) the likely future demand for health services and for persons with the skills and training to work as health care workers for the purposes of the health service,
(b) the sustainability of the supply of persons with the skills and training to work as such,
(c) the priorities that providers of health services have for the education and training of persons wishing to work as such,
(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(e) the objectives of the Secretary of State in exercising public health functions (as defined by section 1H of that Act),
(f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(g) documents published by the Secretary of State under section 100(2) or (3),
(h) the desirability of promoting the integration of health provision with health-related provision and care and support provision,
(i) the desirability of enabling health care workers to switch between different posts relating to health provision, health-related provision or care and support provision, and
(j) such other matters as regulations may specify.
(2) In subsection (1)—
“health provision”, “health-related provision” and “care and support provision” each have the same meaning as in section 3;
“health services” means health services provided as part of the health service.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.