Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Act 2010
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
50 Circumventing requirements of Schedule 7 directions
(1) Schedule 7 to the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 is amended as follows. (2) After paragraph 25 (civil penalties for failure to comply with requirements) insert— 25A (1) An enforcement authority may impose a penalty of such amount as it considers appropriate on a relevant person who has intentionally participated in activities knowing that the object or effect of them was (whether directly or indirectly) to circumvent a requirement imposed by a direction under this Schedule. (2) In sub-paragraph (1) “appropriate” means effective, proportionate and dissuasive. (3) A person on whom a penalty is imposed under this paragraph is not liable to be proceeded against for an offence under paragraph 30A in respect of participation in the same activities. (3) After paragraph 30 (offence of failing to comply with requirements) insert— Offences: relevant person circumventing requirements 30A (1) A relevant person who intentionally participates in activities knowing that the object or effect of them is (whether directly or indirectly) to circumvent a requirement imposed by a direction under this Schedule commits an offence. (2) A person guilty of an offence under this paragraph is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine or both. (3) A person who is convicted of an offence under this paragraph is not liable to a penalty under paragraph 25A in respect of participation in the same activities.
50 Circumventing requirements of Schedule 7 directions
(1) Schedule 7 to the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 is amended as follows. (2) After paragraph 25 (civil penalties for failure to comply with requirements) insert— 25A (1) An enforcement authority may impose a penalty of such amount as it considers appropriate on a relevant person who has intentionally participated in activities knowing that the object or effect of them was (whether directly or indirectly) to circumvent a requirement imposed by a direction under this Schedule. (2) In sub-paragraph (1) “appropriate” means effective, proportionate and dissuasive. (3) A person on whom a penalty is imposed under this paragraph is not liable to be proceeded against for an offence under paragraph 30A in respect of participation in the same activities. (3) After paragraph 30 (offence of failing to comply with requirements) insert— Offences: relevant person circumventing requirements 30A (1) A relevant person who intentionally participates in activities knowing that the object or effect of them is (whether directly or indirectly) to circumvent a requirement imposed by a direction under this Schedule commits an offence. (2) A person guilty of an offence under this paragraph is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine or both. (3) A person who is convicted of an offence under this paragraph is not liable to a penalty under paragraph 25A in respect of participation in the same activities.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.