Propose a change

Charities Act 2011

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

231 Cases where application must or may be refused

(1) The Commission must refuse an application for conversion if— (a) it is not satisfied that the CIO would be a charity at the time it would be registered, (b) the CIO's proposed constitution does not comply with one or more of the requirements of section 206 (constitution of CIOs) and any regulations made under that section, or (c) in the case of an application for conversion made by a company limited by guarantee, the CIO's proposed constitution does not comply with the requirements of section 228(6) and (7). (2) The Commission may refuse an application for conversion if— (a) the proposed name of the CIO— (i) is the same as, or (ii) is in the opinion of the Commission too like, the name or a working name of any other charity (whether registered or not), (b) the Commission is of the opinion referred to in any of paragraphs (b) to (e) of section 42(2) (power to require charity's name or working name to be changed) in relation to the proposed name of the CIO (reading paragraph (b) as referring to the proposed purposes of the CIO and to the activities which it is proposed it should carry on), or (c) having considered any representations received from those whom it has consulted under section 230(1), the Commission considers (having regard to any regulations made under subsection (3)) that it would not be appropriate to grant the application. (3) CIO regulations may make provision about circumstances in which it would not be appropriate to grant an application for conversion. (4) If the Commission refuses an application for conversion, it must so notify the appropriate registrar.

Your change, as a redline

231 Cases where application must or may be refused

(1) The Commission must refuse an application for conversion if— (a) it is not satisfied that the CIO would be a charity at the time it would be registered, (b) the CIO's proposed constitution does not comply with one or more of the requirements of section 206 (constitution of CIOs) and any regulations made under that section, or (c) in the case of an application for conversion made by a company limited by guarantee, the CIO's proposed constitution does not comply with the requirements of section 228(6) and (7). (2) The Commission may refuse an application for conversion if— (a) the proposed name of the CIO— (i) is the same as, or (ii) is in the opinion of the Commission too like, the name or a working name of any other charity (whether registered or not), (b) the Commission is of the opinion referred to in any of paragraphs (b) to (e) of section 42(2) (power to require charity's name or working name to be changed) in relation to the proposed name of the CIO (reading paragraph (b) as referring to the proposed purposes of the CIO and to the activities which it is proposed it should carry on), or (c) having considered any representations received from those whom it has consulted under section 230(1), the Commission considers (having regard to any regulations made under subsection (3)) that it would not be appropriate to grant the application. (3) CIO regulations may make provision about circumstances in which it would not be appropriate to grant an application for conversion. (4) If the Commission refuses an application for conversion, it must so notify the appropriate registrar.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds