Propose a change

Title 11 Agriculture, Livestock and Other Animals

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

11-28-106. Construction and maintenance of partition fences; fencing of state lands.

(a) Except as otherwise provided, the owner of any lawful fence which is or becomes a partition fence separating the owner's land from that belonging to some other person may require the person to pay for one-half (1/2) of what it would or does actually cost to construct the partition fence. In case of refusal, the owner may maintain a civil action against the person refusing and is entitled to recover one-half (1/2) of what it would or did actually cost to construct that portion of the partition fence used by the person and costs of suit. The joint users of a partition fence shall contribute to the cost of maintenance in proportion to their respective interests and if either refuses to pay his share of the cost of maintenance, the other may recover maintenance costs in the manner provided for recovering the cost of construction. (b) Repealed by Laws 2023, ch. 173, § 3. (c) Private landowners whose property adjoins state lands on which the private landowner does not hold a lease may construct a lawful partition fence along state lands and the office of state lands and investments or, if the state lands are currently leased, the lessee of the state lands shall pay for one-half (1/2) of the actual cost of the construction of the lawful partition fence. Private landowners and the office of state lands and investments, or the lessee at all times that the state lands are leased, shall contribute to the cost of maintenance of the lawful partition fence in proportion to their respective interests in the fence.

Your change, as a redline

11-28-106. Construction and maintenance of partition fences; fencing of state lands.

(a) Except as otherwise provided, the owner of any lawful fence which is or becomes a partition fence separating the owner's land from that belonging to some other person may require the person to pay for one-half (1/2) of what it would or does actually cost to construct the partition fence. In case of refusal, the owner may maintain a civil action against the person refusing and is entitled to recover one-half (1/2) of what it would or did actually cost to construct that portion of the partition fence used by the person and costs of suit. The joint users of a partition fence shall contribute to the cost of maintenance in proportion to their respective interests and if either refuses to pay his share of the cost of maintenance, the other may recover maintenance costs in the manner provided for recovering the cost of construction. (b) Repealed by Laws 2023, ch. 173, § 3. (c) Private landowners whose property adjoins state lands on which the private landowner does not hold a lease may construct a lawful partition fence along state lands and the office of state lands and investments or, if the state lands are currently leased, the lessee of the state lands shall pay for one-half (1/2) of the actual cost of the construction of the lawful partition fence. Private landowners and the office of state lands and investments, or the lessee at all times that the state lands are leased, shall contribute to the cost of maintenance of the lawful partition fence in proportion to their respective interests in the fence.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it