Propose a change

Equality Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

121 Armed forces cases

(1) Section 120(1) does not apply to a complaint relating to an act done when the complainant was serving as a member of the armed forces unless— (a) the complainant has made a service complaint about the matter, and (b) the complaint has not been withdrawn. (2) Where the complaint is dealt with by a person or panel appointed by the Defence Council by virtue of section 340C(1)(a) of the 2006 Act, it is to be treated for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) as withdrawn if— (a) the period allowed in accordance with service complaints regulations for bringing an appeal against the person's or panel's decision expires, ... (aa) there are grounds (of which the complainant is aware) on which the complainant is entitled to bring such an appeal, and (b) either— (i) the complainant does not apply to the Armed Forces Commissioner for a review by virtue of section 340D(6)(a) of the 2006 Act (review of decision that appeal brought out of time cannot proceed), or (ii) the complainant does apply for such a review and the Commissioner decides that an appeal against the person's or panel's decision cannot be proceeded with. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) The making of a complaint to an employment tribunal in reliance on subsection (1) does not affect the continuation of the procedures set out in service complaints regulations. (6) In this section— “the 2006 Act” means the Armed Forces Act 2006; “service complaints regulations” means regulations made under section 340B(1) of the 2006 Act.

Your change, as a redline

121 Armed forces cases

(1) Section 120(1) does not apply to a complaint relating to an act done when the complainant was serving as a member of the armed forces unless— (a) the complainant has made a service complaint about the matter, and (b) the complaint has not been withdrawn. (2) Where the complaint is dealt with by a person or panel appointed by the Defence Council by virtue of section 340C(1)(a) of the 2006 Act, it is to be treated for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) as withdrawn if— (a) the period allowed in accordance with service complaints regulations for bringing an appeal against the person's or panel's decision expires, ... (aa) there are grounds (of which the complainant is aware) on which the complainant is entitled to bring such an appeal, and (b) either— (i) the complainant does not apply to the Armed Forces Commissioner for a review by virtue of section 340D(6)(a) of the 2006 Act (review of decision that appeal brought out of time cannot proceed), or (ii) the complainant does apply for such a review and the Commissioner decides that an appeal against the person's or panel's decision cannot be proceeded with. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) The making of a complaint to an employment tribunal in reliance on subsection (1) does not affect the continuation of the procedures set out in service complaints regulations. (6) In this section— “the 2006 Act” means the Armed Forces Act 2006; “service complaints regulations” means regulations made under section 340B(1) of the 2006 Act.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds