Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
123 Meaning of “construct”and “erect”.
(1) For the purposes of—
(a) Part I of this Act, and
(b) any other enactment (whether or not contained in this Act) that relates to building regulations, or that mentions “buildings” or “a building” in a context from which it appears that those expressions are there intended to have the same meaning as in the said Part I,
references to the construction or erection of a building include references to—
(i) the carrying out of such operations (whether for the reconstruction of a building, the roofing over of an open space between walls or buildings, or otherwise) as may be designated in building regulations as operations falling to be treated for those purposes as the construction or erection of a building, and
(ii) the conversion of a movable object into what is by virtue of section 121(1) and (2) above a building.
and “construct” and “erect” shall be construed accordingly.
(2) For the purposes of Part III of this Act, each of the following operations is deemed to be the erection of a building—
(a) the re-erection of a building or part of a building when an outer wall of that building or, as the case may be, that part of a building has been pulled down, or burnt down, to within 10 feet of the surface of the ground adjoining the lowest storey of the building or of that part of the building,
(b) the re-erection of a frame building or part of a frame building when that building or part of a building has been so far pulled down, or burnt down, as to leave only the framework of the lowest storey of the building or of that part of the building,
(c) the roofing over of an open space between walls or buildings,
and “erect” shall be construed accordingly.
Your change, as a redline
123 Meaning of “construct”and “erect”.
(1) For the purposes of—
(a) Part I of this Act, and
(b) any other enactment (whether or not contained in this Act) that relates to building regulations, or that mentions “buildings” or “a building” in a context from which it appears that those expressions are there intended to have the same meaning as in the said Part I,
references to the construction or erection of a building include references to—
(i) the carrying out of such operations (whether for the reconstruction of a building, the roofing over of an open space between walls or buildings, or otherwise) as may be designated in building regulations as operations falling to be treated for those purposes as the construction or erection of a building, and
(ii) the conversion of a movable object into what is by virtue of section 121(1) and (2) above a building.
and “construct” and “erect” shall be construed accordingly.
(2) For the purposes of Part III of this Act, each of the following operations is deemed to be the erection of a building—
(a) the re-erection of a building or part of a building when an outer wall of that building or, as the case may be, that part of a building has been pulled down, or burnt down, to within 10 feet of the surface of the ground adjoining the lowest storey of the building or of that part of the building,
(b) the re-erection of a frame building or part of a frame building when that building or part of a building has been so far pulled down, or burnt down, as to leave only the framework of the lowest storey of the building or of that part of the building,
(c) the roofing over of an open space between walls or buildings,
and “erect” shall be construed accordingly.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.