Chemical Weapons Act 1996
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
30A Revenue and Customs prosecutions
(1) Proceedings for a chemical weapons offence may be instituted by the Director of Public Prosecutions or by order of the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs if it appears to the Director or to the Commissioners that the offence has involved— (a) the development or production outside the United Kingdom of a chemical weapon; (b) the movement of a chemical weapon into or out of any country or territory; (c) any proposal or attempt to do anything falling within paragraph (a) or (b). (2) In this section “chemical weapons offence” means an offence under section 2 above or section 50 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (including an offence of aiding, abetting, counselling, procuring or inciting the commission of, or attempting or conspiring to commit, such an offence). (3) Any proceedings for an offence which are instituted by order of the Commissioners under subsection (1) shall be commenced in the name of an officer of Revenue and Customs , but may be continued by another officer. (4) Where the Commissioners ... investigate, or propose to investigate, any matter with a view to determining— (a) whether there are grounds for believing that a chemical weapons offence has been committed, or (b) whether a person should be prosecuted for such an offence, that matter shall be treated as an assigned matter within the meaning of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979. (5) Nothing in this section affects any power of any person (including any officer) apart from this section. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) This section does not apply to the institution of proceedings in Scotland.
30A Revenue and Customs prosecutions
(1) Proceedings for a chemical weapons offence may be instituted by the Director of Public Prosecutions or by order of the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs if it appears to the Director or to the Commissioners that the offence has involved— (a) the development or production outside the United Kingdom of a chemical weapon; (b) the movement of a chemical weapon into or out of any country or territory; (c) any proposal or attempt to do anything falling within paragraph (a) or (b). (2) In this section “chemical weapons offence” means an offence under section 2 above or section 50 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (including an offence of aiding, abetting, counselling, procuring or inciting the commission of, or attempting or conspiring to commit, such an offence). (3) Any proceedings for an offence which are instituted by order of the Commissioners under subsection (1) shall be commenced in the name of an officer of Revenue and Customs , but may be continued by another officer. (4) Where the Commissioners ... investigate, or propose to investigate, any matter with a view to determining— (a) whether there are grounds for believing that a chemical weapons offence has been committed, or (b) whether a person should be prosecuted for such an offence, that matter shall be treated as an assigned matter within the meaning of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979. (5) Nothing in this section affects any power of any person (including any officer) apart from this section. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) This section does not apply to the institution of proceedings in Scotland.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.