Chemical Weapons Act 1996
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
9 Offences relating to destruction etc.
(1) If— (a) a copy of a notice is served on a person under section 4, (b) the notice relates to an object in his possession at the time the copy is served, (c) he relinquishes possession before the date specified under section 4(3)(e), and (d) he has no reasonable excuse for so relinquishing possession, he is guilty of an offence. (2) If a person wilfully obstructs a person in— (a) entering or searching premises under an authorisation given under section 5(1) or (2) or 7(6) or (7), (b) making an object safe, seizing or removing an object, or affixing a warning, under section 5(4), (c) destroying an object under an authorisation given under section 6(2) or 7(6) or (7), or (d) attempting to do anything mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c), the person so obstructing is guilty of an offence. (3) If— (a) a warning is affixed under section 5(4), (b) a person interferes with the warning, or moves or interferes with the object before the date specified in the warning, and (c) he has no reasonable excuse for doing so, he is guilty of an offence. (4) A person guilty of an offence under any of the preceding provisions of this section is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of an amount not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine. (5) A person who knowingly makes a false or misleading statement in response to a copy of a notice served under section 4, 6 or 7 is guilty of an offence and liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of an amount not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to a fine or to both.
9 Offences relating to destruction etc.
(1) If— (a) a copy of a notice is served on a person under section 4, (b) the notice relates to an object in his possession at the time the copy is served, (c) he relinquishes possession before the date specified under section 4(3)(e), and (d) he has no reasonable excuse for so relinquishing possession, he is guilty of an offence. (2) If a person wilfully obstructs a person in— (a) entering or searching premises under an authorisation given under section 5(1) or (2) or 7(6) or (7), (b) making an object safe, seizing or removing an object, or affixing a warning, under section 5(4), (c) destroying an object under an authorisation given under section 6(2) or 7(6) or (7), or (d) attempting to do anything mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c), the person so obstructing is guilty of an offence. (3) If— (a) a warning is affixed under section 5(4), (b) a person interferes with the warning, or moves or interferes with the object before the date specified in the warning, and (c) he has no reasonable excuse for doing so, he is guilty of an offence. (4) A person guilty of an offence under any of the preceding provisions of this section is liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of an amount not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine. (5) A person who knowingly makes a false or misleading statement in response to a copy of a notice served under section 4, 6 or 7 is guilty of an offence and liable— (a) on summary conviction, to a fine of an amount not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to a fine or to both.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.