International Tribunals (Sierra Leone) Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
1 The Special Court for Sierra Leone
After section 77 of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 (c. 17) (the title to which becomes “International Tribunals established by UN Security Council resolution”), insert— The Special Court for Sierra Leone 77A (1) Her Majesty may by Order in Council make in relation to the Special Court for Sierra Leone provision— (a) having effect in England and Wales, and (b) corresponding to that made in relation to the ICC by sections 42 to 48 (enforcement of sentences of imprisonment), with any necessary modifications. (2) An Order in Council made under this section must be laid before Parliament after it is made.
1 The Special Court for Sierra Leone
After section 77 of the International Criminal Court Act 2001 (c. 17) (the title to which becomes “International Tribunals established by UN Security Council resolution”), insert— The Special Court for Sierra Leone 77A (1) Her Majesty may by Order in Council make in relation to the Special Court for Sierra Leone provision— (a) having effect in England and Wales, and (b) corresponding to that made in relation to the ICC by sections 42 to 48 (enforcement of sentences of imprisonment), with any necessary modifications. (2) An Order in Council made under this section must be laid before Parliament after it is made.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.