The Bank Recovery and Resolution (No. 2) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
186 Remedies on judicial review
(1) Where an application is made for judicial review of a decision of the Bank to exercise the stabilisation powers in relation to an institution under resolution (“relevant proceedings”)—
(a) a ruling by the court that the decision is unlawful shall not affect—
(i) a relevant transfer,
(ii) special bail-in provision (within the meaning given by section 48B of the Banking Act 2009), or
(iii) provision under section 48L of that Act in relation to securities issued by the institution under resolution,
made by a stabilisation instrument made by the Bank pursuant to that decision; and
(b) the court may not quash any provision in a stabilisation instrument made by the Bank if that provision makes—
(i) a relevant transfer;
(ii) special bail-in provision; or
(iii) provision under section 48L of the Banking Act 2009 in relation to securities issued by the institution under resolution.
(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)—
(a) “stabilisation instrument” means—
(i) a share transfer instrument,
(ii) a property transfer instrument,
(iii) a resolution instrument, or
(iv) a third-country instrument,
made by the Bank in the exercise of the stabilisation powers provided for in section 1(4) of the Banking Act 2009, and for these purposes “share transfer instrument”, “property transfer instrument”, “resolution instrument” and “third country instrument” have the meaning given in article 184;
(b) a transfer is a “relevant transfer” if it transfers to any person—
(i) property, rights or liabilities of the institution under resolution or of a relevant resolution company; or
(ii) securities issued by the institution under resolution or by a relevant resolution company;
(c) for the purposes of sub-paragraph (b)—
(i) “resolution company” has the meaning given by section 29A of the Banking Act 2009 ; and
(ii) a resolution company is a relevant resolution company if property, rights or liabilities of the institution under resolution have been transferred to it.
(3) For the purposes of this article “institution under resolution” has the meaning given in article 185.
(4) Paragraph (1) does not affect the power of the court, subject to section 244 of the Banking Act 2009 (immunity), to award damages as a remedy in relevant proceedings.
Your change, as a redline
186 Remedies on judicial review
(1) Where an application is made for judicial review of a decision of the Bank to exercise the stabilisation powers in relation to an institution under resolution (“relevant proceedings”)—
(a) a ruling by the court that the decision is unlawful shall not affect—
(i) a relevant transfer,
(ii) special bail-in provision (within the meaning given by section 48B of the Banking Act 2009), or
(iii) provision under section 48L of that Act in relation to securities issued by the institution under resolution,
made by a stabilisation instrument made by the Bank pursuant to that decision; and
(b) the court may not quash any provision in a stabilisation instrument made by the Bank if that provision makes—
(i) a relevant transfer;
(ii) special bail-in provision; or
(iii) provision under section 48L of the Banking Act 2009 in relation to securities issued by the institution under resolution.
(2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)—
(a) “stabilisation instrument” means—
(i) a share transfer instrument,
(ii) a property transfer instrument,
(iii) a resolution instrument, or
(iv) a third-country instrument,
made by the Bank in the exercise of the stabilisation powers provided for in section 1(4) of the Banking Act 2009, and for these purposes “share transfer instrument”, “property transfer instrument”, “resolution instrument” and “third country instrument” have the meaning given in article 184;
(b) a transfer is a “relevant transfer” if it transfers to any person—
(i) property, rights or liabilities of the institution under resolution or of a relevant resolution company; or
(ii) securities issued by the institution under resolution or by a relevant resolution company;
(c) for the purposes of sub-paragraph (b)—
(i) “resolution company” has the meaning given by section 29A of the Banking Act 2009 ; and
(ii) a resolution company is a relevant resolution company if property, rights or liabilities of the institution under resolution have been transferred to it.
(3) For the purposes of this article “institution under resolution” has the meaning given in article 185.
(4) Paragraph (1) does not affect the power of the court, subject to section 244 of the Banking Act 2009 (immunity), to award damages as a remedy in relevant proceedings.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.