The Bank Recovery and Resolution (No. 2) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
62 Assessment of group resolvability where the PRA or FCA is the consolidating supervisor
(1) This article applies in relation to a relevant group in respect of which the PRA or FCA is the consolidating supervisor. (2) For the purpose of drawing up or reviewing a group resolution plan the Bank must make an assessment of group resolvability in respect of the relevant group and, where there is more than one resolution group in the relevant group, in respect of each resolution group. (3) For the purpose of making the assessment of group resolvability the Bank must— (a) consider all relevant matters, including the matters set out in Schedule 2B and in any technical standards under paragraph (2A); (b) have regard to the circumstances under which resolution entities may meet the conditions for resolution, in particular— (i) supposing that there is a situation of widespread financial instability or an occurrence of events which pose systemic risk; and (ii) supposing that there is no such a situation or occurrence; (c) not assume that any of the group entities will be in receipt of— (i) extraordinary public financial support; (ii) emergency liquidity assistance; or (iii) any other liquidity assistance provided by the Bank under non-standard collateralisation, tenor and interest rate terms; and (d) consult— (i) the appropriate regulator; (ii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3A) The Bank may make technical standards providing— (a) further examples of relevant matters to be considered; and (b) criteria to be examined, for the purposes of making the assessment of group resolvability. (4) Paragraph (3) has effect subject to the imposition of any simplified obligations (within the meaning given by article 9(3)(b)) with respect to the assessment of group resolvability. (5) The relevant group or a resolution group is deemed to be resolvable if the Bank concludes that it would be feasible and credible to apply the resolution tools or exercise resolution powers in respect of resolution entities, or take insolvency proceedings in respect of group entities while avoiding to the maximum extent possible any significant adverse effect on the financial system of the United Kingdom or the continuity of the critical functions of group entities. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62 Assessment of group resolvability where the PRA or FCA is the consolidating supervisor
(1) This article applies in relation to a relevant group in respect of which the PRA or FCA is the consolidating supervisor. (2) For the purpose of drawing up or reviewing a group resolution plan the Bank must make an assessment of group resolvability in respect of the relevant group and, where there is more than one resolution group in the relevant group, in respect of each resolution group. (3) For the purpose of making the assessment of group resolvability the Bank must— (a) consider all relevant matters, including the matters set out in Schedule 2B and in any technical standards under paragraph (2A); (b) have regard to the circumstances under which resolution entities may meet the conditions for resolution, in particular— (i) supposing that there is a situation of widespread financial instability or an occurrence of events which pose systemic risk; and (ii) supposing that there is no such a situation or occurrence; (c) not assume that any of the group entities will be in receipt of— (i) extraordinary public financial support; (ii) emergency liquidity assistance; or (iii) any other liquidity assistance provided by the Bank under non-standard collateralisation, tenor and interest rate terms; and (d) consult— (i) the appropriate regulator; (ii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3A) The Bank may make technical standards providing— (a) further examples of relevant matters to be considered; and (b) criteria to be examined, for the purposes of making the assessment of group resolvability. (4) Paragraph (3) has effect subject to the imposition of any simplified obligations (within the meaning given by article 9(3)(b)) with respect to the assessment of group resolvability. (5) The relevant group or a resolution group is deemed to be resolvable if the Bank concludes that it would be feasible and credible to apply the resolution tools or exercise resolution powers in respect of resolution entities, or take insolvency proceedings in respect of group entities while avoiding to the maximum extent possible any significant adverse effect on the financial system of the United Kingdom or the continuity of the critical functions of group entities. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.