The Bank Recovery and Resolution (No. 2) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
66 Effect of notice of determination
(1) A notice under article 65 has the effect of suspending the Bank's duty to draw up a resolution plan for the institution (or review the resolution plan adopted for the institution) until the Bank has approved relevant proposals or exercised pre-resolution powers. (2) The Bank, after consulting the appropriate regulator, must assess whether the measures set out in relevant proposals would adequately address or effectively remove the impediments. (3) Where the institution— (a) fails to submit relevant proposals within the response period, or (b) the Bank concludes that the measures set out in relevant proposals would not adequately address or effectively remove the impediments, the Bank must exercise pre-resolution powers with the object of requiring the institution to take specified measures to address or remove the impediments (“remedial measures”). (4) In a direction given by the Bank for that purpose the Bank must— (a) demonstrate how the measures set out in relevant proposals would not adequately address or effectively remove the impediments; (b) demonstrate how the remedial measures will adequately address or effectively remove the impediments in a manner proportionate to the burden or restriction imposed by the direction; and (c) require the institution to— (i) prepare a plan showing how it will comply with the remedial measures; and (ii) submit that plan within one month beginning on the date of the direction. (5) Where the consent of the appropriate regulator is not required under section 3A(5) of the Banking Act 2009, the Bank must consult the appropriate regulator and, where appropriate, the Financial Policy Committee before determining remedial measures. (6) For the purpose of assessing relevant proposals and determining remedial measures the Bank must take account of— (a) the threat to financial stability posed by the impediments; and (b) the effect of the remedial measures on— (i) the business and financial stability of the institution and its ability to contribute to the economy of the United Kingdom ...; (ii) the market in the United Kingdom for financial services; (iii) the financial stability of the United Kingdom. (7) The Bank must give the institution written notice of the remedial measures, including a reasoned account of its decision to require the institution to take those measures.
66 Effect of notice of determination
(1) A notice under article 65 has the effect of suspending the Bank's duty to draw up a resolution plan for the institution (or review the resolution plan adopted for the institution) until the Bank has approved relevant proposals or exercised pre-resolution powers. (2) The Bank, after consulting the appropriate regulator, must assess whether the measures set out in relevant proposals would adequately address or effectively remove the impediments. (3) Where the institution— (a) fails to submit relevant proposals within the response period, or (b) the Bank concludes that the measures set out in relevant proposals would not adequately address or effectively remove the impediments, the Bank must exercise pre-resolution powers with the object of requiring the institution to take specified measures to address or remove the impediments (“remedial measures”). (4) In a direction given by the Bank for that purpose the Bank must— (a) demonstrate how the measures set out in relevant proposals would not adequately address or effectively remove the impediments; (b) demonstrate how the remedial measures will adequately address or effectively remove the impediments in a manner proportionate to the burden or restriction imposed by the direction; and (c) require the institution to— (i) prepare a plan showing how it will comply with the remedial measures; and (ii) submit that plan within one month beginning on the date of the direction. (5) Where the consent of the appropriate regulator is not required under section 3A(5) of the Banking Act 2009, the Bank must consult the appropriate regulator and, where appropriate, the Financial Policy Committee before determining remedial measures. (6) For the purpose of assessing relevant proposals and determining remedial measures the Bank must take account of— (a) the threat to financial stability posed by the impediments; and (b) the effect of the remedial measures on— (i) the business and financial stability of the institution and its ability to contribute to the economy of the United Kingdom ...; (ii) the market in the United Kingdom for financial services; (iii) the financial stability of the United Kingdom. (7) The Bank must give the institution written notice of the remedial measures, including a reasoned account of its decision to require the institution to take those measures.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.