Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
103 References to accounting practice and periods of account
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3) In section 288(1) of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (interpretation), at the appropriate place insert—
“period of account” has the meaning given by section 832(1) of the Taxes Act;
.
(4) In the following provisions for “normal accounting practice” or “normal accountancy practice”, wherever occurring, substitute “ generally accepted accounting practice ”
(a) in the Taxes Act 1988, sections ......, ..., 798B(1) ..., ...;
(b) in the Finance Act 1993 (c. 34), sections ... 150(6)(c) and (11)(c), 154(11)(c), (12)(d), (13)(b), (13A)(d) and (13B)(d), 155(7), (11)(d) and (12)(b), 156(2)(e) and (4)(b) and 159(1)(b);
(c) in the Finance Act 1994 (c. 9), section 156(3)(a) and (4)(a);
(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(f) in the Finance Act 2000 (c. 17), ... in Schedule 15, paragraph 29(4), ...;
(g) in the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (c. 2), sections 179(1)(f), 219(1) ...;
(h) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6) The amendments made by subsections (1) to (3) above have effect for the purposes of provisions of this Act using the expressions mentioned (including provisions inserted by amendment in other enactments) whenever those provisions are expressed to have effect or to come, or to have come, into force.
This is without prejudice to the general effect of those amendments.
Your change, as a redline
103 References to accounting practice and periods of account
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3) In section 288(1) of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (interpretation), at the appropriate place insert—
“period of account” has the meaning given by section 832(1) of the Taxes Act;
.
(4) In the following provisions for “normal accounting practice” or “normal accountancy practice”, wherever occurring, substitute “ generally accepted accounting practice ”
(a) in the Taxes Act 1988, sections ......, ..., 798B(1) ..., ...;
(b) in the Finance Act 1993 (c. 34), sections ... 150(6)(c) and (11)(c), 154(11)(c), (12)(d), (13)(b), (13A)(d) and (13B)(d), 155(7), (11)(d) and (12)(b), 156(2)(e) and (4)(b) and 159(1)(b);
(c) in the Finance Act 1994 (c. 9), section 156(3)(a) and (4)(a);
(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(f) in the Finance Act 2000 (c. 17), ... in Schedule 15, paragraph 29(4), ...;
(g) in the Capital Allowances Act 2001 (c. 2), sections 179(1)(f), 219(1) ...;
(h) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(6) The amendments made by subsections (1) to (3) above have effect for the purposes of provisions of this Act using the expressions mentioned (including provisions inserted by amendment in other enactments) whenever those provisions are expressed to have effect or to come, or to have come, into force.
This is without prejudice to the general effect of those amendments.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.