Offensive Weapons Act 2019
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
5 Presumptions in proceedings in Scotland for offence under section 1, 3 or 4
(1) This section applies for the purposes of any trial in proceedings for an alleged offence under section 1(1), 3(2) or (3) or 4(4). (2) Where— (a) a substance is found in a container (whether open or sealed), and (b) there is on the container a description of the contents of the container, the substance found is to be presumed to be a substance of that description. (3) Where an open container is found which— (a) is empty or contains an amount of a substance which is insufficient to allow analysis of it, (b) was sealed at the time it was sold or delivered, and (c) has on it a description of the contents of the container, the container is to be presumed to have contained, at the time it was sold or delivered, a substance of that description. (4) At the trial, any party to the proceedings may rebut the presumption mentioned in subsection (2) or (3) by proving that, at the time of its sale or delivery, the substance in the container was not of the description on the container. (5) A party may lead evidence for the purpose of rebutting the presumption only if the party has, not less than 7 days before the date of the trial, given notice of the intention to do so to the other parties.
5 Presumptions in proceedings in Scotland for offence under section 1, 3 or 4
(1) This section applies for the purposes of any trial in proceedings for an alleged offence under section 1(1), 3(2) or (3) or 4(4). (2) Where— (a) a substance is found in a container (whether open or sealed), and (b) there is on the container a description of the contents of the container, the substance found is to be presumed to be a substance of that description. (3) Where an open container is found which— (a) is empty or contains an amount of a substance which is insufficient to allow analysis of it, (b) was sealed at the time it was sold or delivered, and (c) has on it a description of the contents of the container, the container is to be presumed to have contained, at the time it was sold or delivered, a substance of that description. (4) At the trial, any party to the proceedings may rebut the presumption mentioned in subsection (2) or (3) by proving that, at the time of its sale or delivery, the substance in the container was not of the description on the container. (5) A party may lead evidence for the purpose of rebutting the presumption only if the party has, not less than 7 days before the date of the trial, given notice of the intention to do so to the other parties.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.