The Food Crime Officers (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
25 Duties of the Director General on references under regulation 23 or complaints treated as having been referred under regulation 24
(1) The Director General must, in the case of every complaint referred to the Director General by the chief executive, or treated as having been referred under regulation 24, determine whether or not it is necessary for the complaint to be investigated.
(2) Where the Director General determines under this regulation that it is not necessary for a complaint to be investigated—
(a) in a case where the complaint is already being investigated by the chief executive on the chief executive’s own behalf (and notwithstanding the Director General’s determination), the Director General must refer the complaint back to the chief executive for the investigation to be completed;
(b) in any other case, the Director General may, if the Director General thinks fit, refer the complaint back to the chief executive to be dealt with by the chief executive in accordance with regulation 17.
(3) Where the Director General refers a complaint back under paragraph (2), the Director General must give a notification of the making of the reference back—
(a) to the complainant; and
(b) except in a case where it appears to the Director General that to do so might prejudice an investigation of the complaint (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one), to the person complained against (if any).
Your change, as a redline
25 Duties of the Director General on references under regulation 23 or complaints treated as having been referred under regulation 24
(1) The Director General must, in the case of every complaint referred to the Director General by the chief executive, or treated as having been referred under regulation 24, determine whether or not it is necessary for the complaint to be investigated.
(2) Where the Director General determines under this regulation that it is not necessary for a complaint to be investigated—
(a) in a case where the complaint is already being investigated by the chief executive on the chief executive’s own behalf (and notwithstanding the Director General’s determination), the Director General must refer the complaint back to the chief executive for the investigation to be completed;
(b) in any other case, the Director General may, if the Director General thinks fit, refer the complaint back to the chief executive to be dealt with by the chief executive in accordance with regulation 17.
(3) Where the Director General refers a complaint back under paragraph (2), the Director General must give a notification of the making of the reference back—
(a) to the complainant; and
(b) except in a case where it appears to the Director General that to do so might prejudice an investigation of the complaint (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one), to the person complained against (if any).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.