Propose a change

The Food Crime Officers (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

28 Duties of the Director General on references under regulation 26 or conduct matters treated as having been referred under regulation 27

(1) The Director General must, in the case of every recordable conduct matter referred to the Director General by the chief executive under regulation 26 or treated as having been referred under regulation 27, determine whether or not it is necessary for the matter to be investigated. (2) Where the Director General determines under this regulation that it is not necessary for a recordable conduct matter to be investigated— (a) in a case where the recordable conduct matter is already being investigated by the chief executive on the chief executive’s own behalf, and notwithstanding the Director General’s determination, the Director General must refer the matter back to the chief executive for the investigation to be completed; (b) in any other case, the Director General may, if the Director General thinks fit, refer the matter back to the chief executive to be dealt with by the chief executive in such manner (if any) as the chief executive may determine. (3) Where— (a) the Director General refers a matter back to the chief executive under this regulation; and (b) the Director General does not consider that to do so might prejudice an investigation of that matter (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one), the Director General must give a notification of the making of the reference to the person to whose conduct that matter relates.

Your change, as a redline

28 Duties of the Director General on references under regulation 26 or conduct matters treated as having been referred under regulation 27

(1) The Director General must, in the case of every recordable conduct matter referred to the Director General by the chief executive under regulation 26 or treated as having been referred under regulation 27, determine whether or not it is necessary for the matter to be investigated. (2) Where the Director General determines under this regulation that it is not necessary for a recordable conduct matter to be investigated— (a) in a case where the recordable conduct matter is already being investigated by the chief executive on the chief executive’s own behalf, and notwithstanding the Director General’s determination, the Director General must refer the matter back to the chief executive for the investigation to be completed; (b) in any other case, the Director General may, if the Director General thinks fit, refer the matter back to the chief executive to be dealt with by the chief executive in such manner (if any) as the chief executive may determine. (3) Where— (a) the Director General refers a matter back to the chief executive under this regulation; and (b) the Director General does not consider that to do so might prejudice an investigation of that matter (whether an existing investigation or a possible future one), the Director General must give a notification of the making of the reference to the person to whose conduct that matter relates.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds