The Food Crime Officers (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
37 Appointment of persons to carry out investigations
A person may not be appointed to carry out an investigation under regulation 42, 43 or 44— (a) unless that person has an appropriate level of knowledge, skills and experience to plan and manage the investigation; (b) if that person’s involvement could reasonably give rise to a concern as to whether that person could act impartially under these Regulations; or (c) if that person works, directly or indirectly, under the management of the person whose conduct is being investigated.
37 Appointment of persons to carry out investigations
A person may not be appointed to carry out an investigation under regulation 42, 43 or 44— (a) unless that person has an appropriate level of knowledge, skills and experience to plan and manage the investigation; (b) if that person’s involvement could reasonably give rise to a concern as to whether that person could act impartially under these Regulations; or (c) if that person works, directly or indirectly, under the management of the person whose conduct is being investigated.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.