Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
15 Killing animals at conclusion of regulated procedures.
(1) Where a protected animal— (a) has been subjected to a series of regulated procedures for a particular purpose; and (b) at the conclusion of the series is suffering or likely to suffer adverse effects as a result of being subjected to the series , the person who applied those procedures, or the last of them, shall ensure that the animal is immediately killed in accordance with section 15A . (2) Subsection (1) above is without prejudice to any condition of a project licence requiring an animal to be killed at the conclusion of a regulated procedure in circumstances other than those mentioned in that subsection.
15 Killing animals at conclusion of regulated procedures.
(1) Where a protected animal— (a) has been subjected to a series of regulated procedures for a particular purpose; and (b) at the conclusion of the series is suffering or likely to suffer adverse effects as a result of being subjected to the series , the person who applied those procedures, or the last of them, shall ensure that the animal is immediately killed in accordance with section 15A . (2) Subsection (1) above is without prejudice to any condition of a project licence requiring an animal to be killed at the conclusion of a regulated procedure in circumstances other than those mentioned in that subsection.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.