Commission Regulation (EEC) No 509/92 of 28 February 1992 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
ANNEX
Description of goods Classification CN code Reasons (1) (2) (3) 1. Product, consisting of a mixture of residues from the manufacture of starch from maize (approximately 40 %), residues from the extraction of oil from maize germs by the wet method (approximately 30 %) and of residues of the distillation of alcohol from maize (‘corn distillers’) (approximately 30 %), presenting the following analytical characteristics, weight on dry matter: 2309 90 41 Classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature, by additional note 1 to chapter 23 and by the wording of CN codees 2309, 2309 90 en 2309 90 41 . — starch 18 % determined in accordance with the method set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009, Annex III, part L — proteins (N x 6,25) 28 % determined in accordance with the method set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009, Annex III, part C — fats 4,4 % determined in accordance with the method set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009, Annex III, part H It is used in animal feed. 2. Preparation consisting mainly of a mixture of approximately 60 % calcium hydrogen-orthophosphate [dicalcium phosphate], by weight, and approximately 40 % calcium bis (dihydrogenorthophosphate) [monocalcium phosphate], by weight, used in animal feed. 2309 90 96 Classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 2309, 2309 90 and 2309 90 96 (see also the Explanatory Notes to the HS, heading 23.09, part II. C). (1) OJ No L 123, 29. 5. 1972, p. 6. (2) OJ No L 15, 18. 1. 1984, p. 28.
ANNEX
Description of goods Classification CN code Reasons (1) (2) (3) 1. Product, consisting of a mixture of residues from the manufacture of starch from maize (approximately 40 %), residues from the extraction of oil from maize germs by the wet method (approximately 30 %) and of residues of the distillation of alcohol from maize (‘corn distillers’) (approximately 30 %), presenting the following analytical characteristics, weight on dry matter: 2309 90 41 Classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature, by additional note 1 to chapter 23 and by the wording of CN codees 2309, 2309 90 en 2309 90 41 . — starch 18 % determined in accordance with the method set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009, Annex III, part L — proteins (N x 6,25) 28 % determined in accordance with the method set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009, Annex III, part C — fats 4,4 % determined in accordance with the method set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009, Annex III, part H It is used in animal feed. 2. Preparation consisting mainly of a mixture of approximately 60 % calcium hydrogen-orthophosphate [dicalcium phosphate], by weight, and approximately 40 % calcium bis (dihydrogenorthophosphate) [monocalcium phosphate], by weight, used in animal feed. 2309 90 96 Classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 2309, 2309 90 and 2309 90 96 (see also the Explanatory Notes to the HS, heading 23.09, part II. C). (1) OJ No L 123, 29. 5. 1972, p. 6. (2) OJ No L 15, 18. 1. 1984, p. 28.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.