Scotland Act 2012
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
35 References of compatibility issues to the High Court or Supreme Court
In the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, after section 288ZA (inserted by section 34) insert— References of compatibility issues to the High Court or Supreme Court 288ZB (1) Where a compatibility issue has arisen in criminal proceedings before a court, other than a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court, the court may, instead of determining it, refer the issue to the High Court. (2) The Lord Advocate or the Advocate General for Scotland, if a party to criminal proceedings before a court, other than a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court, may require the court to refer to the High Court any compatibility issue which has arisen in the proceedings. (3) The High Court may, instead of determining a compatibility issue referred to it under subsection (2), refer it to the Supreme Court. (4) Where a compatibility issue has arisen in criminal proceedings before a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court, otherwise than on a reference, the court may, instead of determining it, refer it to the Supreme Court. (5) The Lord Advocate or the Advocate General for Scotland, if a party to criminal proceedings before a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court, may require the court to refer to the Supreme Court any compatibility issue which has arisen in the proceedings otherwise than on a reference. (6) On a reference to the Supreme Court under this section— (a) the powers of the Supreme Court are exercisable only for the purpose of determining the compatibility issue; (b) for that purpose the Court may make any change in the formulation of that issue that it thinks necessary in the interests of justice. (7) When it has determined a compatibility issue on a reference under this section, the Supreme Court must remit the proceedings to the High Court. (8) An issue referred to the High Court or the Supreme Court under this section is referred to it for determination. (9) In this section “compatibility issue” has the meaning given by section 288ZA.
35 References of compatibility issues to the High Court or Supreme Court
In the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, after section 288ZA (inserted by section 34) insert— References of compatibility issues to the High Court or Supreme Court 288ZB (1) Where a compatibility issue has arisen in criminal proceedings before a court, other than a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court, the court may, instead of determining it, refer the issue to the High Court. (2) The Lord Advocate or the Advocate General for Scotland, if a party to criminal proceedings before a court, other than a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court, may require the court to refer to the High Court any compatibility issue which has arisen in the proceedings. (3) The High Court may, instead of determining a compatibility issue referred to it under subsection (2), refer it to the Supreme Court. (4) Where a compatibility issue has arisen in criminal proceedings before a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court, otherwise than on a reference, the court may, instead of determining it, refer it to the Supreme Court. (5) The Lord Advocate or the Advocate General for Scotland, if a party to criminal proceedings before a court consisting of two or more judges of the High Court, may require the court to refer to the Supreme Court any compatibility issue which has arisen in the proceedings otherwise than on a reference. (6) On a reference to the Supreme Court under this section— (a) the powers of the Supreme Court are exercisable only for the purpose of determining the compatibility issue; (b) for that purpose the Court may make any change in the formulation of that issue that it thinks necessary in the interests of justice. (7) When it has determined a compatibility issue on a reference under this section, the Supreme Court must remit the proceedings to the High Court. (8) An issue referred to the High Court or the Supreme Court under this section is referred to it for determination. (9) In this section “compatibility issue” has the meaning given by section 288ZA.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.