Subsidy Control Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
70 Review of subsidy decisions
(1) An interested party who is aggrieved by the making of a subsidy decision may apply to the Competition Appeal Tribunal for a review of the decision. (2) Where an application for a review of a subsidy decision relates to a subsidy given under a subsidy scheme, the application must be made for a review of the decision to make the subsidy scheme (and may not be made in respect of a decision to give a subsidy under that scheme). (3) The means of making an application is by sending the Tribunal a notice of appeal in accordance with Tribunal Procedure Rules. (4) The notice of appeal must be sent within the period specified, in relation to the decision appealed against, in Part 5A of the Tribunal Procedure Rules. (5) In determining the application, the Tribunal must apply the same principles as would be applied— (a) in the case of proceedings in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, by the High Court in determining proceedings on judicial review; (b) in the case of proceedings in Scotland, by the Court of Session on an application to the supervisory jurisdiction of that Court. (6) Except so far as the Tribunal directs otherwise, the effect of a subsidy decision is not suspended by reason of the making of an application under this section. (7) In this Part— “interested party” means— a person whose interests may be affected by the giving of the subsidy or the making of the subsidy scheme in respect of which the application under subsection (1) is made, or the Secretary of State; “subsidy decision” means a decision to give a subsidy or make a subsidy scheme; “the Tribunal” means the Competition Appeal Tribunal; “Tribunal Procedure Rules” means rules made under section 15 of the Enterprise Act 2002.
70 Review of subsidy decisions
(1) An interested party who is aggrieved by the making of a subsidy decision may apply to the Competition Appeal Tribunal for a review of the decision. (2) Where an application for a review of a subsidy decision relates to a subsidy given under a subsidy scheme, the application must be made for a review of the decision to make the subsidy scheme (and may not be made in respect of a decision to give a subsidy under that scheme). (3) The means of making an application is by sending the Tribunal a notice of appeal in accordance with Tribunal Procedure Rules. (4) The notice of appeal must be sent within the period specified, in relation to the decision appealed against, in Part 5A of the Tribunal Procedure Rules. (5) In determining the application, the Tribunal must apply the same principles as would be applied— (a) in the case of proceedings in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, by the High Court in determining proceedings on judicial review; (b) in the case of proceedings in Scotland, by the Court of Session on an application to the supervisory jurisdiction of that Court. (6) Except so far as the Tribunal directs otherwise, the effect of a subsidy decision is not suspended by reason of the making of an application under this section. (7) In this Part— “interested party” means— a person whose interests may be affected by the giving of the subsidy or the making of the subsidy scheme in respect of which the application under subsection (1) is made, or the Secretary of State; “subsidy decision” means a decision to give a subsidy or make a subsidy scheme; “the Tribunal” means the Competition Appeal Tribunal; “Tribunal Procedure Rules” means rules made under section 15 of the Enterprise Act 2002.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.