Propose a change

National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

29B Powers of NHS Tribunal.

(1) Subsection (2) applies where the Tribunal are of the opinion— (a) on inquiring into an efficiency case, that the person meets the first condition for disqualification; (b) on inquiring into a fraud case, that the person meets the second condition for disqualification; (c) on inquiring into an unsuitability case, that the person meets the third condition for disqualification. (2) The Tribunal shall disqualify him for inclusion in— (a) the list to which the case relates; (b) all lists within the same paragraph of subsection (8) of section 29 as that list; and (c) where the list to which the case relates is a list referred to in— (i) paragraph (c) of that subsection, all lists within paragraph (cc) of that subsection; (ii) that paragraph (cc), all lists within that paragraph (c). (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) The Tribunal shall not make a disqualification . . . under this section if they are of the opinion that it would be unjust to do so. (5) A disqualification under this section shall have effect when the case is finally concluded. (6) If a person is disqualified for inclusion in any list prepared by a Health Board, the Board must not enter him in the list and (if he is already included in the list) must remove him from the list.

Your change, as a redline

29B Powers of NHS Tribunal.

(1) Subsection (2) applies where the Tribunal are of the opinion— (a) on inquiring into an efficiency case, that the person meets the first condition for disqualification; (b) on inquiring into a fraud case, that the person meets the second condition for disqualification; (c) on inquiring into an unsuitability case, that the person meets the third condition for disqualification. (2) The Tribunal shall disqualify him for inclusion in— (a) the list to which the case relates; (b) all lists within the same paragraph of subsection (8) of section 29 as that list; and (c) where the list to which the case relates is a list referred to in— (i) paragraph (c) of that subsection, all lists within paragraph (cc) of that subsection; (ii) that paragraph (cc), all lists within that paragraph (c). (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) The Tribunal shall not make a disqualification . . . under this section if they are of the opinion that it would be unjust to do so. (5) A disqualification under this section shall have effect when the case is finally concluded. (6) If a person is disqualified for inclusion in any list prepared by a Health Board, the Board must not enter him in the list and (if he is already included in the list) must remove him from the list.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds