Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
32 Regulations as to sections 29 to 31.
(1) Regulations shall make provision—
(a) for inquiries. . . under sections 29 to 30to be held in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed by or determined under the regulations. . . and, in particular, for . . . any person who is the subject of such an inquiry to be informed, as soon as may be, of the substance of any charge or complaint to which the inquiry relates and to have an opportunity—
(i) of appearing, either in person or by counsel or solicitor or such other representative as may be prescribed, before the Tribunal . . ., and
(ii) of being heard by the Tribunal . . ., and of calling witnesses and producing other evidence on his behalf,
and for the hearing, . . . to be in public if the person who is the subject of the inquiry so requests;
(b) for conferring on the Tribunal . . .such powers as the Secretary of State considers necessary for the purpose of holding such inquiries, including power to require the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents and to administer oaths; and
(c) for the publication of decisions of the Tribunal . . . under this section and of the imposition and removal of any disqualification or conditionimposed by virtue of this section, and for the intimation to any person who is the subject of such an inquiry of the grounds upon which any disqualification or conditionhas been imposed in his case.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1)(a) may in particular provide that, where (apart from the regulations) it would be the duty of the Tribunal to inquire into an efficiency case and a fraud case or an unsuitability case or any other combination of more than one such category of case in respect of the same person, they may inquire into one case before inquiring into the other and, after proceedings in the first case are finally disposed of, may if they think it appropriate adjourn the other case indefinitely.
Your change, as a redline
32 Regulations as to sections 29 to 31.
(1) Regulations shall make provision—
(a) for inquiries. . . under sections 29 to 30to be held in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed by or determined under the regulations. . . and, in particular, for . . . any person who is the subject of such an inquiry to be informed, as soon as may be, of the substance of any charge or complaint to which the inquiry relates and to have an opportunity—
(i) of appearing, either in person or by counsel or solicitor or such other representative as may be prescribed, before the Tribunal . . ., and
(ii) of being heard by the Tribunal . . ., and of calling witnesses and producing other evidence on his behalf,
and for the hearing, . . . to be in public if the person who is the subject of the inquiry so requests;
(b) for conferring on the Tribunal . . .such powers as the Secretary of State considers necessary for the purpose of holding such inquiries, including power to require the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents and to administer oaths; and
(c) for the publication of decisions of the Tribunal . . . under this section and of the imposition and removal of any disqualification or conditionimposed by virtue of this section, and for the intimation to any person who is the subject of such an inquiry of the grounds upon which any disqualification or conditionhas been imposed in his case.
(2) Regulations under subsection (1)(a) may in particular provide that, where (apart from the regulations) it would be the duty of the Tribunal to inquire into an efficiency case and a fraud case or an unsuitability case or any other combination of more than one such category of case in respect of the same person, they may inquire into one case before inquiring into the other and, after proceedings in the first case are finally disposed of, may if they think it appropriate adjourn the other case indefinitely.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.