The Absolute Ground for Possession for Anti-social Behaviour (Review Procedure) (England) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
7 Procedure at hearing
(1) The hearing must be conducted by a person appointed for that purpose by the landlord, who may be an officer or employee of the landlord. (2) A person appointed under paragraph (1) who is an officer or employee of the landlord must be a person of greater seniority than the person who made the original decision. (3) The person referred to in paragraph (1) must not be a person who was involved in the making of the original decision. (4) The hearing must be conducted with the minimum amount of formality and in accordance with any directions given by the person conducting it. (5) At the hearing the applicant may— (a) make oral or written representations relevant to the decision to be made on the review; (b) be accompanied or represented by another person appointed by the applicant for that purpose (whether that person is professionally qualified or not); (c) call persons to give evidence on any matter relevant to the decision to be made on the review; and (d) put questions to any person who gives evidence at the hearing. (6) The person who made the original decision may attend the hearing and may do any of the things the applicant may do pursuant to paragraph (5). (7) A person appointed as a representative pursuant to paragraph (5)(b) has the same rights as the applicant (or, as the case may be, the person who made the original decision) for the purposes of the conduct of the hearing.
7 Procedure at hearing
(1) The hearing must be conducted by a person appointed for that purpose by the landlord, who may be an officer or employee of the landlord. (2) A person appointed under paragraph (1) who is an officer or employee of the landlord must be a person of greater seniority than the person who made the original decision. (3) The person referred to in paragraph (1) must not be a person who was involved in the making of the original decision. (4) The hearing must be conducted with the minimum amount of formality and in accordance with any directions given by the person conducting it. (5) At the hearing the applicant may— (a) make oral or written representations relevant to the decision to be made on the review; (b) be accompanied or represented by another person appointed by the applicant for that purpose (whether that person is professionally qualified or not); (c) call persons to give evidence on any matter relevant to the decision to be made on the review; and (d) put questions to any person who gives evidence at the hearing. (6) The person who made the original decision may attend the hearing and may do any of the things the applicant may do pursuant to paragraph (5). (7) A person appointed as a representative pursuant to paragraph (5)(b) has the same rights as the applicant (or, as the case may be, the person who made the original decision) for the purposes of the conduct of the hearing.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.