Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
187 Enhanced due diligence: designation of high-risk countries
(1) The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 is amended as follows. (2) In Schedule 2 (money laundering and terrorist financing etc)— (a) in paragraph 4— (i) the existing text becomes sub-paragraph (1); (ii) after sub-paragraph (1) insert— (2) Provide for the imposition of requirements relating to enhanced customer due diligence measures by reference to prescribed high-risk countries. (3) Provision made by virtue of sub-paragraph (2) may in particular refer to a list of countries published by the Financial Action Task Force as it has effect from time to time. ; (b) in paragraph 23, after sub-paragraph (2) insert— (2A) In paragraph 4 (measures in relation to customers of relevant persons), the reference in sub-paragraph (2) to requirements includes requirements imposed by or under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. (3) In section 55 (parliamentary procedure for regulations)— (a) in subsection (2), for the first “which” substitute “made during the period of 6 months beginning with the day on which the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 is passed if the instrument”; (b) in subsection (9), for the words from “if” to the end substitute “if they only make provision prescribing high-risk countries by virtue of paragraph 4(2) of Schedule 2”.
187 Enhanced due diligence: designation of high-risk countries
(1) The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 is amended as follows. (2) In Schedule 2 (money laundering and terrorist financing etc)— (a) in paragraph 4— (i) the existing text becomes sub-paragraph (1); (ii) after sub-paragraph (1) insert— (2) Provide for the imposition of requirements relating to enhanced customer due diligence measures by reference to prescribed high-risk countries. (3) Provision made by virtue of sub-paragraph (2) may in particular refer to a list of countries published by the Financial Action Task Force as it has effect from time to time. ; (b) in paragraph 23, after sub-paragraph (2) insert— (2A) In paragraph 4 (measures in relation to customers of relevant persons), the reference in sub-paragraph (2) to requirements includes requirements imposed by or under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. (3) In section 55 (parliamentary procedure for regulations)— (a) in subsection (2), for the first “which” substitute “made during the period of 6 months beginning with the day on which the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 is passed if the instrument”; (b) in subsection (9), for the words from “if” to the end substitute “if they only make provision prescribing high-risk countries by virtue of paragraph 4(2) of Schedule 2”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.