Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
202 Large organisations: parent undertakings
(1) For the purposes of section 199(1) and (2) a relevant body which is a parent undertaking is a “large organisation” only if the group headed by it satisfied two or more of the following conditions in the financial year of the body that precedes the year of the fraud offence— Aggregate turnover | More than £36 million net (or £43.2 million gross) Aggregate balance sheet total | More than £18 million net (or £21.6 million gross) Aggregate number of employees | More than 250. (2) The aggregate figures are ascertained by aggregating the relevant figures determined in accordance with section 201 for each member of the group. (3) In relation to the aggregate figures for turnover and balance sheet total, “net” and “gross”— (a) except where paragraph (b) applies, have the meaning given by subsection (6) of section 466 of the Companies Act 2006; (b) in the case of accounts that are not of a kind specified in the definition of “net” in that subsection, have a corresponding meaning. (4) In this section— “balance sheet total” (in relation to a relevant body and a financial year) has the same meaning as in section 201; “group” means a parent undertaking and its subsidiary undertakings; “turnover” (in relation to a UK company or other relevant body) has the same meaning as in section 201; “year of the fraud offence” is to be interpreted in accordance with section 199(1) or (2) (as the case requires). (5) In this section “balance sheet total” and “turnover”, in relation to a subsidiary undertaking which is not a relevant body, have a meaning corresponding to the meaning given by subsection (4).
202 Large organisations: parent undertakings
(1) For the purposes of section 199(1) and (2) a relevant body which is a parent undertaking is a “large organisation” only if the group headed by it satisfied two or more of the following conditions in the financial year of the body that precedes the year of the fraud offence— Aggregate turnover | More than £36 million net (or £43.2 million gross) Aggregate balance sheet total | More than £18 million net (or £21.6 million gross) Aggregate number of employees | More than 250. (2) The aggregate figures are ascertained by aggregating the relevant figures determined in accordance with section 201 for each member of the group. (3) In relation to the aggregate figures for turnover and balance sheet total, “net” and “gross”— (a) except where paragraph (b) applies, have the meaning given by subsection (6) of section 466 of the Companies Act 2006; (b) in the case of accounts that are not of a kind specified in the definition of “net” in that subsection, have a corresponding meaning. (4) In this section— “balance sheet total” (in relation to a relevant body and a financial year) has the same meaning as in section 201; “group” means a parent undertaking and its subsidiary undertakings; “turnover” (in relation to a UK company or other relevant body) has the same meaning as in section 201; “year of the fraud offence” is to be interpreted in accordance with section 199(1) or (2) (as the case requires). (5) In this section “balance sheet total” and “turnover”, in relation to a subsidiary undertaking which is not a relevant body, have a meaning corresponding to the meaning given by subsection (4).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.