Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
34 Disqualification on summary conviction: NI
(1) Article 8 of the Company Directors Disqualification (Northern Ireland) Order 2002 (S.I. 2002/3150 (N.I. 4)) (disqualification on summary conviction) is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph (1), for the words from “provision of the companies legislation” to “the registrar” substitute “of the relevant provisions of the companies legislation”. (3) For paragraph (3) substitute— (3) Those circumstances are that, during the 5 years ending with the date of the conviction, there have been no fewer than 3 relevant findings of guilt in relation to the person. (3A) For these purposes, there is a relevant finding of guilt in relation to the person if — (a) the person is convicted of an offence counting for the purposes of this Article (including the offence of which the person is convicted as mentioned in paragraph (2) and any other offence of which the person is convicted on the same occasion), (b) a financial penalty of the kind mentioned in Article 6(3)(aa) is imposed on the person, or (c) a default order within the meaning of Article 6(3)(b) is made against the person. (4) Omit paragraph (4). (5) For paragraph (4A) substitute— (4A) In this Article “relevant provisions of the companies legislation” has the meaning given by Article 6(3ZA).
34 Disqualification on summary conviction: NI
(1) Article 8 of the Company Directors Disqualification (Northern Ireland) Order 2002 (S.I. 2002/3150 (N.I. 4)) (disqualification on summary conviction) is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph (1), for the words from “provision of the companies legislation” to “the registrar” substitute “of the relevant provisions of the companies legislation”. (3) For paragraph (3) substitute— (3) Those circumstances are that, during the 5 years ending with the date of the conviction, there have been no fewer than 3 relevant findings of guilt in relation to the person. (3A) For these purposes, there is a relevant finding of guilt in relation to the person if — (a) the person is convicted of an offence counting for the purposes of this Article (including the offence of which the person is convicted as mentioned in paragraph (2) and any other offence of which the person is convicted on the same occasion), (b) a financial penalty of the kind mentioned in Article 6(3)(aa) is imposed on the person, or (c) a default order within the meaning of Article 6(3)(b) is made against the person. (4) Omit paragraph (4). (5) For paragraph (4A) substitute— (4A) In this Article “relevant provisions of the companies legislation” has the meaning given by Article 6(3ZA).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.