Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Consequential amendments
(1) The Human Tissue Act 2004 is further amended as follows. (2) In section 1 (authorisation of activities for scheduled purposes), after subsection (9B) insert— (9C) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to the following activities done in Northern Ireland in relation to relevant material that was removed from a human body in England— (a) the storage for use for the purpose of transplantation of the relevant material; (b) the use for the purpose of transplantation of the relevant material. (3) In section 1, in subsection (10)(c), for “or (9B)(b)” substitute “ , (9B)(b) or (9C) ”. (4) In section 27 (provision with respect to consent), after subsection (8) insert— (8ZA) The duty under section 26(3) shall also have effect, in particular, to require the Authority to give practical guidance on the circumstances in which the person concerned is to be deemed to have consented under section 3(6)(ba). (8ZB) In giving practical guidance by virtue of subsection (8ZA), the Authority must, in particular, give guidance about the provision of information of the type described in section 3(6B) by a person who stood in a qualifying relationship to the person concerned immediately before death. (5) In section 52 (orders and regulations), in subsection (3) (statutory instruments to which negative procedure does not apply), after “1(11),” insert “ 3(9), ”. (6) In section 52, in subsection (4) (statutory instruments to which affirmative procedure applies), after “no regulations under section” insert “ 3(9), ”. (7) In section 52, in the list in subsection (10) (requirement to consult), after “section 1(11)” insert— “ section 3(9); ”.
2 Consequential amendments
(1) The Human Tissue Act 2004 is further amended as follows. (2) In section 1 (authorisation of activities for scheduled purposes), after subsection (9B) insert— (9C) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to the following activities done in Northern Ireland in relation to relevant material that was removed from a human body in England— (a) the storage for use for the purpose of transplantation of the relevant material; (b) the use for the purpose of transplantation of the relevant material. (3) In section 1, in subsection (10)(c), for “or (9B)(b)” substitute “ , (9B)(b) or (9C) ”. (4) In section 27 (provision with respect to consent), after subsection (8) insert— (8ZA) The duty under section 26(3) shall also have effect, in particular, to require the Authority to give practical guidance on the circumstances in which the person concerned is to be deemed to have consented under section 3(6)(ba). (8ZB) In giving practical guidance by virtue of subsection (8ZA), the Authority must, in particular, give guidance about the provision of information of the type described in section 3(6B) by a person who stood in a qualifying relationship to the person concerned immediately before death. (5) In section 52 (orders and regulations), in subsection (3) (statutory instruments to which negative procedure does not apply), after “1(11),” insert “ 3(9), ”. (6) In section 52, in subsection (4) (statutory instruments to which affirmative procedure applies), after “no regulations under section” insert “ 3(9), ”. (7) In section 52, in the list in subsection (10) (requirement to consult), after “section 1(11)” insert— “ section 3(9); ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.