Building Safety Act 2022
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
104 Appeals against decisions of the regulator made under this Part
(1) This section applies in relation to a decision of the regulator— (a) not to register a building on an application under section 78(1); (b) to remove a building from the register under section 78(3); (c) to refuse an application for a building assessment certificate under section 81(3); (d) to give a direction under section 83(2). (2) An affected person may appeal the decision. (3) An appeal may be on the grounds— (a) that the decision was based on an error of fact; (b) that the decision was wrong in law; (c) that the decision was unreasonable. (4) In this section “an affected person” means— (a) in relation to a decision of the regulator mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (1), an accountable person for the higher-risk building (or a person who would be an accountable person for the building if the building were a higher-risk building); (b) in relation to a decision of the regulator mentioned in paragraph (c) of subsection (1), an accountable person for the higher-risk building; (c) in relation to a decision of the regulator mentioned in paragraph (d) of subsection (1), the accountable person subject to the direction.
104 Appeals against decisions of the regulator made under this Part
(1) This section applies in relation to a decision of the regulator— (a) not to register a building on an application under section 78(1); (b) to remove a building from the register under section 78(3); (c) to refuse an application for a building assessment certificate under section 81(3); (d) to give a direction under section 83(2). (2) An affected person may appeal the decision. (3) An appeal may be on the grounds— (a) that the decision was based on an error of fact; (b) that the decision was wrong in law; (c) that the decision was unreasonable. (4) In this section “an affected person” means— (a) in relation to a decision of the regulator mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (1), an accountable person for the higher-risk building (or a person who would be an accountable person for the building if the building were a higher-risk building); (b) in relation to a decision of the regulator mentioned in paragraph (c) of subsection (1), an accountable person for the higher-risk building; (c) in relation to a decision of the regulator mentioned in paragraph (d) of subsection (1), the accountable person subject to the direction.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.