Companies (Audit, Investigations and Community Enterprise) Act 2004
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 8 Repeals and revocations
Section 64 Title and reference | Extent of repeal or revocation Companies Act 1985 (c. 6) | In section 27(4), the word “and” at the end of paragraph (c). Section 245C(6). Section 256(3). In section 310, in subsection (1) the words “any officer of the company or”, and in subsection (3) the words “officer or” (in both places) and the words from “section 144(3)” to “nominee) or”. Section 390A(3). In section 734(1), the words “section 389A(3) or”. In Schedule 4A, in paragraph 1(1), the words “section 390A(3) (amount of auditors' remuneration) and”. In Schedule 24, the entry relating to section 447(6). Insolvency Act 1985 (c. 65) | In Schedule 6, paragraph 4. Insolvency Act 1986 (c. 45) | In Schedule 13, in Part 1, the entry relating to section 449(1) of the Companies Act 1985. Companies Act 1989 (c. 40) | Section 48(3). Section 63. Section 65. Section 67. Section 69(2) and (4). Section 120(2) and (3). Companies (Northern Ireland) Order 1990 (S.I. 1990/593 (N.I. 5)) | Article 48(2)(a). Article 49. In Article 56, the entry relating to “Director (in Schedule 14)”. Schedule 14. Friendly Societies Act 1992 (c. 40) | In Schedule 21, paragraph 7. Pensions Act 1995 (c. 26) | In Schedule 3, paragraph 12. Bank of England Act 1998 (c. 11) | In Schedule 5, paragraph 62. Competition Act 1998 (c. 41) | In Schedule 2, paragraph 3. Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (c. 23) | In Schedule 3, paragraph 6. Competition Act 1998 (Competition Commission) Transitional, Consequential and Supplemental Provisions Order 1999 (S.I. 1999/506) | Article 41. Enterprise Act 2002 (c. 40) | In Schedule 25, paragraph 22.
SCHEDULE 8 Repeals and revocations
Section 64 Title and reference | Extent of repeal or revocation Companies Act 1985 (c. 6) | In section 27(4), the word “and” at the end of paragraph (c). Section 245C(6). Section 256(3). In section 310, in subsection (1) the words “any officer of the company or”, and in subsection (3) the words “officer or” (in both places) and the words from “section 144(3)” to “nominee) or”. Section 390A(3). In section 734(1), the words “section 389A(3) or”. In Schedule 4A, in paragraph 1(1), the words “section 390A(3) (amount of auditors' remuneration) and”. In Schedule 24, the entry relating to section 447(6). Insolvency Act 1985 (c. 65) | In Schedule 6, paragraph 4. Insolvency Act 1986 (c. 45) | In Schedule 13, in Part 1, the entry relating to section 449(1) of the Companies Act 1985. Companies Act 1989 (c. 40) | Section 48(3). Section 63. Section 65. Section 67. Section 69(2) and (4). Section 120(2) and (3). Companies (Northern Ireland) Order 1990 (S.I. 1990/593 (N.I. 5)) | Article 48(2)(a). Article 49. In Article 56, the entry relating to “Director (in Schedule 14)”. Schedule 14. Friendly Societies Act 1992 (c. 40) | In Schedule 21, paragraph 7. Pensions Act 1995 (c. 26) | In Schedule 3, paragraph 12. Bank of England Act 1998 (c. 11) | In Schedule 5, paragraph 62. Competition Act 1998 (c. 41) | In Schedule 2, paragraph 3. Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (c. 23) | In Schedule 3, paragraph 6. Competition Act 1998 (Competition Commission) Transitional, Consequential and Supplemental Provisions Order 1999 (S.I. 1999/506) | Article 41. Enterprise Act 2002 (c. 40) | In Schedule 25, paragraph 22.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.