Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 (repealed)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2A Evidence and inferences.
(1) This section applies where a person is charged with an offence under section 2(1)(a) above; and references here to a specified organisation must be construed in accordance with section 2B below. (2) Subsection (3) below applies if a police officer of or above the rank of superintendent states in oral evidence that in his opinion the accused— (a) belongs to an organisation which is specified, or (b) belonged at a particular time to an organisation which was then specified. (3) If this subsection applies— (a) the statement shall be admissible as evidence of the matter stated, but (b) the accused shall not be committed for trial in England and Wales, or be found to have a case to answer or be convicted, solely on the basis of the statement. (4) Subsection (6) below applies if evidence is given that— (a) at any time before being charged with the offence the accused, on being questioned under caution by a constable, failed to mention a fact which is material to the offence and which he could reasonably be expected to mention, and (b) before being questioned he was permitted to consult a solicitor. (5) Subsection (6) below also applies if evidence is given that— (a) on being charged with the offence or informed by a constable that he might be prosecuted for it the accused failed to mention a fact which is material to the offence and which he could reasonably be expected to mention, and (b) before being charged or informed he was permitted to consult a solicitor. (6) If this subsection applies— (a) the court or jury, in considering any question whether the accused belongs or belonged at a particular time to a specified organisation, may draw from the failure inferences relating to that question, but (b) the accused shall not be committed for trial in England and Wales, or be found to have a case to answer or be convicted, solely on the basis of the inferences. (7) Subject to any directions by the court, evidence tending to establish the failure may be given before or after evidence tending to establish the fact which the accused is alleged to have failed to mention. (8) This section does not— (a) prejudice the admissibility of evidence admissible apart from this section; (b) preclude the drawing of inferences which could be drawn apart from this section; (c) prejudice an enactment providing (in whatever words) that an answer or evidence given by a person in specified circumstances is not admissible in evidence against him or some other person in any proceedings or class of proceedings (however described, and whether civil or criminal). (9) In subsection (8)(c) above the reference to giving evidence is a reference to giving it in any manner (whether by giving information, making discovery or disclosure, producing documents or otherwise). (10) In any proceedings in Scotland for an offence under section 2(1)(a) above in which the accused is charged with belonging to a specified organisation, where the court or jury draws an inference as mentioned in subsection (6) above any evidence that he belongs or, as the case may be, belonged to the organisation shall be sufficient evidence of that matter. (11) In this section “police officer” means a member of— (a) a police force within the meaning of the Police Act 1996 or the Police (Scotland) Act 1967, or (b) the Royal Ulster Constabulary. (12) This section does not apply to a statement made or failure occurring before the day on which the Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998 was passed.
2A Evidence and inferences.
(1) This section applies where a person is charged with an offence under section 2(1)(a) above; and references here to a specified organisation must be construed in accordance with section 2B below. (2) Subsection (3) below applies if a police officer of or above the rank of superintendent states in oral evidence that in his opinion the accused— (a) belongs to an organisation which is specified, or (b) belonged at a particular time to an organisation which was then specified. (3) If this subsection applies— (a) the statement shall be admissible as evidence of the matter stated, but (b) the accused shall not be committed for trial in England and Wales, or be found to have a case to answer or be convicted, solely on the basis of the statement. (4) Subsection (6) below applies if evidence is given that— (a) at any time before being charged with the offence the accused, on being questioned under caution by a constable, failed to mention a fact which is material to the offence and which he could reasonably be expected to mention, and (b) before being questioned he was permitted to consult a solicitor. (5) Subsection (6) below also applies if evidence is given that— (a) on being charged with the offence or informed by a constable that he might be prosecuted for it the accused failed to mention a fact which is material to the offence and which he could reasonably be expected to mention, and (b) before being charged or informed he was permitted to consult a solicitor. (6) If this subsection applies— (a) the court or jury, in considering any question whether the accused belongs or belonged at a particular time to a specified organisation, may draw from the failure inferences relating to that question, but (b) the accused shall not be committed for trial in England and Wales, or be found to have a case to answer or be convicted, solely on the basis of the inferences. (7) Subject to any directions by the court, evidence tending to establish the failure may be given before or after evidence tending to establish the fact which the accused is alleged to have failed to mention. (8) This section does not— (a) prejudice the admissibility of evidence admissible apart from this section; (b) preclude the drawing of inferences which could be drawn apart from this section; (c) prejudice an enactment providing (in whatever words) that an answer or evidence given by a person in specified circumstances is not admissible in evidence against him or some other person in any proceedings or class of proceedings (however described, and whether civil or criminal). (9) In subsection (8)(c) above the reference to giving evidence is a reference to giving it in any manner (whether by giving information, making discovery or disclosure, producing documents or otherwise). (10) In any proceedings in Scotland for an offence under section 2(1)(a) above in which the accused is charged with belonging to a specified organisation, where the court or jury draws an inference as mentioned in subsection (6) above any evidence that he belongs or, as the case may be, belonged to the organisation shall be sufficient evidence of that matter. (11) In this section “police officer” means a member of— (a) a police force within the meaning of the Police Act 1996 or the Police (Scotland) Act 1967, or (b) the Royal Ulster Constabulary. (12) This section does not apply to a statement made or failure occurring before the day on which the Criminal Justice (Terrorism and Conspiracy) Act 1998 was passed.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.