Clean Air Act 1956 (repealed 27.8.1993)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SECOND SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS OF ALKALI &C. WORKS REGULATION ACT, 1906
Section 17. For subsection (2) of section one, there shall be substituted the following subsection— (2) The owner of any alkali work which is carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence. For subsection (2) of section two, there shall be substituted the following subsection— (2) If the owner of any alkali work fails, in theopinion of thecourt having cognizance of the matter, to use such means, he shall be guilty of an offence. For subsection (3) of section six there shall be substituted the following subsection— (3) The owner of any sulphuric acid work or any muriatic acid work which is carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence. For subsection (2) of section seven there shall be substituted the following subsection— (2) If the owner of any such work fails, in the opinion of the court having cognizance of the matter, to use such means, he shall be guilty of an offence. For subsection (8) of section nine there shall be substituted the following subsection— (8) The owner of a work which has been carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence. . . .
SECOND SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS OF ALKALI &C. WORKS REGULATION ACT, 1906
Section 17. For subsection (2) of section one, there shall be substituted the following subsection— (2) The owner of any alkali work which is carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence. For subsection (2) of section two, there shall be substituted the following subsection— (2) If the owner of any alkali work fails, in theopinion of thecourt having cognizance of the matter, to use such means, he shall be guilty of an offence. For subsection (3) of section six there shall be substituted the following subsection— (3) The owner of any sulphuric acid work or any muriatic acid work which is carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence. For subsection (2) of section seven there shall be substituted the following subsection— (2) If the owner of any such work fails, in the opinion of the court having cognizance of the matter, to use such means, he shall be guilty of an offence. For subsection (8) of section nine there shall be substituted the following subsection— (8) The owner of a work which has been carried on in contravention of this section shall be guilty of an offence. . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.