Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
125 Chief superintendents
(1) In section 9H(2) of the 1996 Act (ranks that shall be prescribed for the metropolitan police force), after “those of” there shall be inserted “ chief superintendent, ”. (2) In section 13(1) of that Act (ranks that shall be prescribed for other police forces), after “ranks of” there shall be inserted “ chief superintendent, ”. (3) In the provisions of that Act that are set out in subsection (4), before the word “superintendent”, wherever occurring, there shall be inserted “ chief ”. (4) Those provisions are— (a) section 50(3) (meaning of “senior officer” for the purposes of proceedings in which a member of a police force may be dismissed etc.); (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) section 84(1) and (3) (representation at disciplinary and other proceedings). (5) In Schedule 6 to the 1996 Act (appeals to police appeal tribunals)— (a) in paragraph 10(a), before “superintendent” there shall be inserted “ chief ”; and (b) in paragraph 10(c)(i)— (i) after “of the rank of” there shall be inserted “ chief superintendent or ”; and (ii) for “that rank” there shall be substituted “ one of those ranks ”. (6) The amendments of Schedule 6 to that Act by virtue of this section shall not affect any appeal brought by a member of a police force under section 85 of that Act before the coming into force of this section.
125 Chief superintendents
(1) In section 9H(2) of the 1996 Act (ranks that shall be prescribed for the metropolitan police force), after “those of” there shall be inserted “ chief superintendent, ”. (2) In section 13(1) of that Act (ranks that shall be prescribed for other police forces), after “ranks of” there shall be inserted “ chief superintendent, ”. (3) In the provisions of that Act that are set out in subsection (4), before the word “superintendent”, wherever occurring, there shall be inserted “ chief ”. (4) Those provisions are— (a) section 50(3) (meaning of “senior officer” for the purposes of proceedings in which a member of a police force may be dismissed etc.); (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) section 84(1) and (3) (representation at disciplinary and other proceedings). (5) In Schedule 6 to the 1996 Act (appeals to police appeal tribunals)— (a) in paragraph 10(a), before “superintendent” there shall be inserted “ chief ”; and (b) in paragraph 10(c)(i)— (i) after “of the rank of” there shall be inserted “ chief superintendent or ”; and (ii) for “that rank” there shall be substituted “ one of those ranks ”. (6) The amendments of Schedule 6 to that Act by virtue of this section shall not affect any appeal brought by a member of a police force under section 85 of that Act before the coming into force of this section.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.