Financial Services Act 2021
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
8 Review of which benchmarks are critical benchmarks
(1) Article A20 of the Benchmarks Regulation (review of critical benchmarks) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) to (5). (2) In paragraph 2, for point (a) (but not the “and” at the end) substitute— (a) whether an administrator located in the United Kingdom provides a benchmark that satisfies one or more of conditions (a), (b), (c) or (d) of paragraph 1 of Article 20; . (3) In paragraph 2(b), for “point (a)(i) or (ii)” substitute “ point (a) ”. (4) In paragraph 3(b), for “point (a)(i) or (ii)” substitute “ point (a) ”. (5) In paragraph 6, for point (b) substitute— (b) the Treasury consider that the benchmark satisfies one or more of conditions (a), (b), (c) or (d) of paragraph 1 of Article 20. (6) In Article 20(1) of the Benchmarks Regulation (critical benchmarks: conditions and other matters)— (a) in the opening words of point (c), for “all” substitute “ both ”, (b) omit point (c)(i), and (c) after point (c) insert— (d) the benchmark has a sufficient number of appropriate market-led substitutes that it does not fulfil the criterion in point (c)(ii), but: (i) it is not reasonably practicable for one or more users of the benchmark to switch to one of those substitutes, and (ii) the benchmark fulfils the criterion in point (c)(iii).
8 Review of which benchmarks are critical benchmarks
(1) Article A20 of the Benchmarks Regulation (review of critical benchmarks) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) to (5). (2) In paragraph 2, for point (a) (but not the “and” at the end) substitute— (a) whether an administrator located in the United Kingdom provides a benchmark that satisfies one or more of conditions (a), (b), (c) or (d) of paragraph 1 of Article 20; . (3) In paragraph 2(b), for “point (a)(i) or (ii)” substitute “ point (a) ”. (4) In paragraph 3(b), for “point (a)(i) or (ii)” substitute “ point (a) ”. (5) In paragraph 6, for point (b) substitute— (b) the Treasury consider that the benchmark satisfies one or more of conditions (a), (b), (c) or (d) of paragraph 1 of Article 20. (6) In Article 20(1) of the Benchmarks Regulation (critical benchmarks: conditions and other matters)— (a) in the opening words of point (c), for “all” substitute “ both ”, (b) omit point (c)(i), and (c) after point (c) insert— (d) the benchmark has a sufficient number of appropriate market-led substitutes that it does not fulfil the criterion in point (c)(ii), but: (i) it is not reasonably practicable for one or more users of the benchmark to switch to one of those substitutes, and (ii) the benchmark fulfils the criterion in point (c)(iii).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.