Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
27 Removal of qualifying period before enfranchisement and extension claims
(1) In section 1 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (“the LRA 1967”) (tenants entitled to enfranchisement or extension)— (a) in subsection (1), omit paragraph (b) and the “and” preceding it; (b) in subsection (1ZC), in the words before paragraph (a), for “(1)(a) and (b)” substitute “(1)”. (2) In section 39 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (“the LRHUDA 1993”) (right of qualifying tenant of flat to acquire new lease)— (a) in subsection (1)— (i) after “conferring on a” insert “qualifying”; (ii) omit “, in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (2),”; (b) omit subsection (2) (requirement to have been a qualifying tenant for last two years); (c) omit subsection (3A) (right of personal representatives). (3) Omit section 42(4A) of the LRHUDA 1993 (notices given by personal representatives).
27 Removal of qualifying period before enfranchisement and extension claims
(1) In section 1 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (“the LRA 1967”) (tenants entitled to enfranchisement or extension)— (a) in subsection (1), omit paragraph (b) and the “and” preceding it; (b) in subsection (1ZC), in the words before paragraph (a), for “(1)(a) and (b)” substitute “(1)”. (2) In section 39 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (“the LRHUDA 1993”) (right of qualifying tenant of flat to acquire new lease)— (a) in subsection (1)— (i) after “conferring on a” insert “qualifying”; (ii) omit “, in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (2),”; (b) omit subsection (2) (requirement to have been a qualifying tenant for last two years); (c) omit subsection (3A) (right of personal representatives). (3) Omit section 42(4A) of the LRHUDA 1993 (notices given by personal representatives).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.