Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
64 Restriction on recovery of non-litigation costs of enfranchisement, extension and right to manage
After section 20I of the LTA 1985 (as inserted by section 59) insert— Limitation of variable service charges: non-litigation costs of enfranchisement etc 20J (1) Non-litigation costs incurred, or to be incurred, by a landlord in connection with a relevant claim are not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of a variable service charge payable by a tenant who is a non-participating tenant in relation to that claim. (2) A lease, contract or other arrangement is of no effect to the extent it makes provision to the contrary. (3) In this section and section 20K— “the 1967 Act” means the Leasehold Reform Act 1967; “the 1993 Act” means the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993; “the 2002 Act” means the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002; “non-litigation costs” means costs incurred, or to be incurred, other than in connection with proceedings before a court or tribunal; “non-participating tenant”, in relation to a relevant claim, means a tenant who is not a participating tenant; “participating tenant”, in relation to a relevant claim, means a tenant who— in the case of a claim under Part 1 of the 1967 Act or Chapter 1 or 2 of Part 1 of the 1993 Act, is making the claim; in the case of a claim under Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the 2002 Act, is or has been a member of the RTM company making the claim; “relevant claim” means— a claim under Part 1 of the 1967 Act (enfranchisement and extension of leases of houses); a claim under Chapter 1 or 2 of Part 1 of the 1993 Act (enfranchisement and extension of leases of flats); a claim under Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the 2002 Act (right to manage); “RTM company” has the same meaning as in Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the 2002 Act (see section 71 of that Act). (4) For provision about when a participating tenant is and is not liable in respect of non-litigation costs in relation to a relevant claim, see— (a) section 19A of the 1967 Act; (b) section 89A of the 1993 Act; (c) section 87A of the 2002 Act. Right to claim where non-litigation costs charged contrary to section 20J 20K (1) This section applies if, despite section 20J(1), a non-participating tenant in relation to a relevant claim pays a prohibited amount to any person. (2) For the purposes of this section, a “prohibited amount” is an amount that is— (a) demanded as a variable service charge, and (b) attributable to non-litigation costs incurred, or to be incurred, in connection with the claim. (3) The appropriate tribunal may, on the application of the tenant, order the person to which the prohibited amount was paid to return all or any part of the amount to the tenant.
64 Restriction on recovery of non-litigation costs of enfranchisement, extension and right to manage
After section 20I of the LTA 1985 (as inserted by section 59) insert— Limitation of variable service charges: non-litigation costs of enfranchisement etc 20J (1) Non-litigation costs incurred, or to be incurred, by a landlord in connection with a relevant claim are not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of a variable service charge payable by a tenant who is a non-participating tenant in relation to that claim. (2) A lease, contract or other arrangement is of no effect to the extent it makes provision to the contrary. (3) In this section and section 20K— “the 1967 Act” means the Leasehold Reform Act 1967; “the 1993 Act” means the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993; “the 2002 Act” means the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002; “non-litigation costs” means costs incurred, or to be incurred, other than in connection with proceedings before a court or tribunal; “non-participating tenant”, in relation to a relevant claim, means a tenant who is not a participating tenant; “participating tenant”, in relation to a relevant claim, means a tenant who— in the case of a claim under Part 1 of the 1967 Act or Chapter 1 or 2 of Part 1 of the 1993 Act, is making the claim; in the case of a claim under Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the 2002 Act, is or has been a member of the RTM company making the claim; “relevant claim” means— a claim under Part 1 of the 1967 Act (enfranchisement and extension of leases of houses); a claim under Chapter 1 or 2 of Part 1 of the 1993 Act (enfranchisement and extension of leases of flats); a claim under Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the 2002 Act (right to manage); “RTM company” has the same meaning as in Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the 2002 Act (see section 71 of that Act). (4) For provision about when a participating tenant is and is not liable in respect of non-litigation costs in relation to a relevant claim, see— (a) section 19A of the 1967 Act; (b) section 89A of the 1993 Act; (c) section 87A of the 2002 Act. Right to claim where non-litigation costs charged contrary to section 20J 20K (1) This section applies if, despite section 20J(1), a non-participating tenant in relation to a relevant claim pays a prohibited amount to any person. (2) For the purposes of this section, a “prohibited amount” is an amount that is— (a) demanded as a variable service charge, and (b) attributable to non-litigation costs incurred, or to be incurred, in connection with the claim. (3) The appropriate tribunal may, on the application of the tenant, order the person to which the prohibited amount was paid to return all or any part of the amount to the tenant.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.