Propose a change

School Standards and Framework Act 1998

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

88I Other functions of adjudicator relating to admission arrangements

(1) This section applies where admission arrangements have been determined — (a) by an admission authority for a maintained school in England under section 88C , or (b) by an admission authority for an Academy school. (2) Where it appears to the Secretary of State that the admission arrangements do not, or may not, conform with the requirements relating to admission arrangements, the Secretary of State may refer the admission arrangements to the adjudicator. (3) Subsection (4) applies where— (a) the Secretary of State refers the admission arrangements to the adjudicator under subsection (2), ... (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) The adjudicator must— (a) consider the admission arrangements, and (b) decide whether they conform with those requirements and, if not, in what respect they do not. (5) Where it appears to the adjudicator that the admission arrangements do not, or may not, conform with the requirements relating to admission arrangements (and subsection (4) does not apply)— (a) the adjudicator may consider the admission arrangements, and (b) if the adjudicator considers the arrangements under paragraph (a), the adjudicator must decide whether they conform with those requirements and, if not, in what respect they do not. (6) Regulations may make provision prescribing the steps which may be taken by an admission authority where the adjudicator— (a) is considering the authority's admission arrangements under subsection (4)(a) or (5)(a), but (b) has not yet made a decision in the case under subsection (4)(b) or (5)(b) (as the case may be).

Your change, as a redline

88I Other functions of adjudicator relating to admission arrangements

(1) This section applies where admission arrangements have been determined — (a) by an admission authority for a maintained school in England under section 88C , or (b) by an admission authority for an Academy school. (2) Where it appears to the Secretary of State that the admission arrangements do not, or may not, conform with the requirements relating to admission arrangements, the Secretary of State may refer the admission arrangements to the adjudicator. (3) Subsection (4) applies where— (a) the Secretary of State refers the admission arrangements to the adjudicator under subsection (2), ... (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) The adjudicator must— (a) consider the admission arrangements, and (b) decide whether they conform with those requirements and, if not, in what respect they do not. (5) Where it appears to the adjudicator that the admission arrangements do not, or may not, conform with the requirements relating to admission arrangements (and subsection (4) does not apply)— (a) the adjudicator may consider the admission arrangements, and (b) if the adjudicator considers the arrangements under paragraph (a), the adjudicator must decide whether they conform with those requirements and, if not, in what respect they do not. (6) Regulations may make provision prescribing the steps which may be taken by an admission authority where the adjudicator— (a) is considering the authority's admission arrangements under subsection (4)(a) or (5)(a), but (b) has not yet made a decision in the case under subsection (4)(b) or (5)(b) (as the case may be).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds