Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
46 Interpretation of Part II.
(1) In this Part of this Act:— “ business ” has the meaning assigned to it by subsection (2) of section twenty-three of this Act; “current tenancy” means the tenancy under which the tenant holds for the time being; “ date of termination ” has the meaning assigned to it by subsection (1) of section twenty-five of this Act; subject to the provisions of section thirty-two of this Act, “ the holding ” has the meaning assigned to it by subsection (3) of section twenty-three of this Act; “interim rent” has the meaning given by section 24A(1) of this Act; “ mining lease ” has the same meaning as in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927. (2) For the purposes of this Part of this Act, a person has a controlling interest in a company, if, had he been a company, the other company would have been its subsidiary; and in this Part— “company” has the meaning given by section 1(1) of the Companies Act 2006; and “subsidiary” has the meaning given by section 1159 of that Act.
46 Interpretation of Part II.
(1) In this Part of this Act:— “ business ” has the meaning assigned to it by subsection (2) of section twenty-three of this Act; “current tenancy” means the tenancy under which the tenant holds for the time being; “ date of termination ” has the meaning assigned to it by subsection (1) of section twenty-five of this Act; subject to the provisions of section thirty-two of this Act, “ the holding ” has the meaning assigned to it by subsection (3) of section twenty-three of this Act; “interim rent” has the meaning given by section 24A(1) of this Act; “ mining lease ” has the same meaning as in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927. (2) For the purposes of this Part of this Act, a person has a controlling interest in a company, if, had he been a company, the other company would have been its subsidiary; and in this Part— “company” has the meaning given by section 1(1) of the Companies Act 2006; and “subsidiary” has the meaning given by section 1159 of that Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.