Propose a change

The Employment Tribunals (Early Conciliation: Exemptions and Rules of Procedure) (Amendment) Regulations 2026

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

5 Amendment to rule 2

(1) In the Schedule, rule 2 (early conciliation form requirements) is amended as follows. (2) For paragraph (2), substitute— (2) An early conciliation form must— (a) contain the prospective claimant’s name; (b) contain— (i) an address; (ii) a telephone number, if any; and (iii) an email address, if any, at which the prospective claimant can be contacted; (c) contain the prospective respondent’s name; (d) contain an address at which the prospective respondent can be contacted; and (e) confirm whether or not the prospective claimant wishes to reach a settlement. . (3) After paragraph (2), insert— (2A) Where the prospective claimant wishes to reach a settlement, an early conciliation form must also— (a) contain, where known to the prospective claimant, a telephone number and email address at which the prospective respondent can be contacted; (b) confirm whether or not the prospective claimant consents to ACAS contacting the prospective respondent about the matter; (c) provide an indication of what the matter is; (d) confirm if the matter is, or is alleged to be, ongoing or, if not, provide an indication of how long ago the matter occurred or finished occurring, or is alleged to have occurred or finished occurring; (e) confirm whether or not the prospective claimant raised the matter with the prospective respondent; and (f) confirm whether or not the prospective claimant is or was employed, or alleges that they are or were employed, by the prospective respondent. (2B) Where there is more than one prospective respondent— (a) the reference to “the prospective respondent” in paragraph (2A)(e) is to be read as a reference to at least one prospective respondent; and (b) otherwise, references to “the prospective respondent” in this rule are to be read as references to each prospective respondent. (2C) Where the prospective claimant wishes to satisfy the early conciliation requirement in respect of more than one matter in accordance with rule 1(2)— (a) the reference to “the matter” in paragraph (2A)(e) is to be read as a reference to at least one matter; and (b) otherwise, references to “the matter” in this rule are to be read as references to each matter. . (4) In paragraph (3), for “paragraph (2)”, substitute “paragraph (2) or, where applicable, (2A)”.

Your change, as a redline

5 Amendment to rule 2

(1) In the Schedule, rule 2 (early conciliation form requirements) is amended as follows. (2) For paragraph (2), substitute— (2) An early conciliation form must— (a) contain the prospective claimant’s name; (b) contain— (i) an address; (ii) a telephone number, if any; and (iii) an email address, if any, at which the prospective claimant can be contacted; (c) contain the prospective respondent’s name; (d) contain an address at which the prospective respondent can be contacted; and (e) confirm whether or not the prospective claimant wishes to reach a settlement. . (3) After paragraph (2), insert— (2A) Where the prospective claimant wishes to reach a settlement, an early conciliation form must also— (a) contain, where known to the prospective claimant, a telephone number and email address at which the prospective respondent can be contacted; (b) confirm whether or not the prospective claimant consents to ACAS contacting the prospective respondent about the matter; (c) provide an indication of what the matter is; (d) confirm if the matter is, or is alleged to be, ongoing or, if not, provide an indication of how long ago the matter occurred or finished occurring, or is alleged to have occurred or finished occurring; (e) confirm whether or not the prospective claimant raised the matter with the prospective respondent; and (f) confirm whether or not the prospective claimant is or was employed, or alleges that they are or were employed, by the prospective respondent. (2B) Where there is more than one prospective respondent— (a) the reference to “the prospective respondent” in paragraph (2A)(e) is to be read as a reference to at least one prospective respondent; and (b) otherwise, references to “the prospective respondent” in this rule are to be read as references to each prospective respondent. (2C) Where the prospective claimant wishes to satisfy the early conciliation requirement in respect of more than one matter in accordance with rule 1(2)— (a) the reference to “the matter” in paragraph (2A)(e) is to be read as a reference to at least one matter; and (b) otherwise, references to “the matter” in this rule are to be read as references to each matter. . (4) In paragraph (3), for “paragraph (2)”, substitute “paragraph (2) or, where applicable, (2A)”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds