The Vehicle Emissions Trading Schemes (Amendment) Order 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Amendment to article 3 (interpretation)
(1) In article 3(1)— (a) in paragraph (e) of the definition of “manufacturer”, after “Regulation (EU) 2017/1151” insert “or Regulation (EU) 595/2009”; (b) after the definition of “type approval” insert— “UN Regulation No 154” means UN Regulation No 154 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP); ; (c) in paragraph (b) of the definition of “the zero-emission conditions”, after “van or SPV,” insert “and subject to paragraph (8A),”. (2) After article 3(8) insert— (8A) Condition B does not need to be met in the case of a vehicle which was type-approved in accordance with Annex 21 to Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as a Fuel Cell Vehicle or a Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle where the fuel cell is powered by hydrogen. (8B) For the purposes of paragraph (8A)— “Fuel Cell Vehicle” has the same meaning as in— point 3.3.19 of Annex XXI of Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as that Regulation has effect in domestic law, or where the Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as that Regulation applies in EU law is relevant, paragraph 3.3.19 of UN Regulation No 154; “Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle” has the same meaning as in— point 3.3.20 of Annex XXI of Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as that Regulation has effect in domestic law, or where the Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as that Regulation applies in EU law is relevant, paragraph 3.3.20 of UN Regulation No 154. .
3 Amendment to article 3 (interpretation)
(1) In article 3(1)— (a) in paragraph (e) of the definition of “manufacturer”, after “Regulation (EU) 2017/1151” insert “or Regulation (EU) 595/2009”; (b) after the definition of “type approval” insert— “UN Regulation No 154” means UN Regulation No 154 – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of light duty passenger and commercial vehicles with regards to criteria emissions, emissions of carbon dioxide and fuel consumption and/or the measurement of electric energy consumption and electric range (WLTP); ; (c) in paragraph (b) of the definition of “the zero-emission conditions”, after “van or SPV,” insert “and subject to paragraph (8A),”. (2) After article 3(8) insert— (8A) Condition B does not need to be met in the case of a vehicle which was type-approved in accordance with Annex 21 to Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as a Fuel Cell Vehicle or a Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle where the fuel cell is powered by hydrogen. (8B) For the purposes of paragraph (8A)— “Fuel Cell Vehicle” has the same meaning as in— point 3.3.19 of Annex XXI of Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as that Regulation has effect in domestic law, or where the Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as that Regulation applies in EU law is relevant, paragraph 3.3.19 of UN Regulation No 154; “Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle” has the same meaning as in— point 3.3.20 of Annex XXI of Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as that Regulation has effect in domestic law, or where the Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 as that Regulation applies in EU law is relevant, paragraph 3.3.20 of UN Regulation No 154. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.