Town and Country Planning (Minerals) Act 1981 (repealed 27.5.1997)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
20 Periodical reviews of mineral workings.
The following section shall be inserted after section 251 of the 1972 Act— Duty of planning authorities to review mineral workings. 251A (1) It shall be the duty of every planning authority— (a) to undertake at such intervals as they consider fit reviews of every site in their area in, on or under which operations for the winning and working of minerals— (i) are being carried out ; or (ii) have been carried out at any time during the relevant period ; or (iii) are authorised by planning permission but have not been begun ; and (b) to make in respect of any such site any order section 42, 49, 49A or 19B of this Act that they consider appropriate. (2) In subsection (1) of this section “the relevant period”, in relation to a review, means the period of five years preceding the date of the beginning of the review or such other period as may be prescribed. .
20 Periodical reviews of mineral workings.
The following section shall be inserted after section 251 of the 1972 Act— Duty of planning authorities to review mineral workings. 251A (1) It shall be the duty of every planning authority— (a) to undertake at such intervals as they consider fit reviews of every site in their area in, on or under which operations for the winning and working of minerals— (i) are being carried out ; or (ii) have been carried out at any time during the relevant period ; or (iii) are authorised by planning permission but have not been begun ; and (b) to make in respect of any such site any order section 42, 49, 49A or 19B of this Act that they consider appropriate. (2) In subsection (1) of this section “the relevant period”, in relation to a review, means the period of five years preceding the date of the beginning of the review or such other period as may be prescribed. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.