The Trade, Aircraft and Shipping Sanctions (Civil Enforcement) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
16 Reporting obligations: aircraft and shipping sanctions
(1) A relevant person (“RP”) must inform the Secretary of State as soon as practicable if— (a) RP knows, or has reasonable cause to suspect, that a person (“P”) has breached a prohibition or failed to comply with an obligation under aircraft sanctions regulations or shipping sanctions regulations, and (b) the information or other matter on which the knowledge or cause for suspicion is based came to RP in the course of— (i) chartering an aircraft or ship by way of business, (ii) carrying on business in connection with acting as an airport operator or a harbour authority, or (iii) carrying on activities, whether paid or unpaid and whether for business or leisure, in connection with acting as— (aa) a pilot in command, (bb) an operator, (cc) a master, or (dd) a pilot. (2) Where RP informs the Secretary of State under paragraph (1), RP must state— (a) the information or other matter on which the knowledge or suspicion is based, and (b) any information it holds about P by which P can be identified. (3) An RP who fails to comply with a requirement in this regulation commits an offence. (4) In this regulation— “airport operator”, “operator” and “pilot in command” have the meaning given in section 6(10) (aircraft sanctions) of the Act; “harbour authority”, “master” and “pilot” have the meaning given in section 7(14) (shipping sanctions) of the Act; “relevant person” means— a pilot in command (in relation to aircraft); an operator (in relation to aircraft); an airport operator; a person that charters an aircraft or ship by way of business; a master or pilot (in relation to a ship or fishing vessel, as the case may be); a harbour authority.
16 Reporting obligations: aircraft and shipping sanctions
(1) A relevant person (“RP”) must inform the Secretary of State as soon as practicable if— (a) RP knows, or has reasonable cause to suspect, that a person (“P”) has breached a prohibition or failed to comply with an obligation under aircraft sanctions regulations or shipping sanctions regulations, and (b) the information or other matter on which the knowledge or cause for suspicion is based came to RP in the course of— (i) chartering an aircraft or ship by way of business, (ii) carrying on business in connection with acting as an airport operator or a harbour authority, or (iii) carrying on activities, whether paid or unpaid and whether for business or leisure, in connection with acting as— (aa) a pilot in command, (bb) an operator, (cc) a master, or (dd) a pilot. (2) Where RP informs the Secretary of State under paragraph (1), RP must state— (a) the information or other matter on which the knowledge or suspicion is based, and (b) any information it holds about P by which P can be identified. (3) An RP who fails to comply with a requirement in this regulation commits an offence. (4) In this regulation— “airport operator”, “operator” and “pilot in command” have the meaning given in section 6(10) (aircraft sanctions) of the Act; “harbour authority”, “master” and “pilot” have the meaning given in section 7(14) (shipping sanctions) of the Act; “relevant person” means— a pilot in command (in relation to aircraft); an operator (in relation to aircraft); an airport operator; a person that charters an aircraft or ship by way of business; a master or pilot (in relation to a ship or fishing vessel, as the case may be); a harbour authority.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.