Propose a change

Human Tissue Act 2004

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

45 Non-consensual analysis of DNA

(1) A person commits an offence if— (a) he has any bodily material intending— (i) that any human DNA in the material be analysed without qualifying consent, and (ii) that the results of the analysis be used otherwise than for an excepted purpose, (b) the material is not of a kind excepted under subsection (2), and (c) he does not reasonably believe the material to be of a kind so excepted. (2) Bodily material is excepted if — (a) it is material which has come from the body of a person who died before the day on which this section comes into force and at least one hundred years have elapsed since the date of the person’s death, (b) it is an existing holding and the person who has it is not in possession, and not likely to come into possession, of information from which the individual from whose body the material has come can be identified, or (c) it is an embryo outside the human body. (3) A person guilty of an offence under this section— (a) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) is liable on conviction on indictment— (i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years, or (ii) to a fine, or (iii) to both. (4) Schedule 4 (which makes provision for the interpretation of “qualifying consent” and “use for an excepted purpose” in subsection (1)(a)) has effect. (5) In this section (and Schedule 4)— “bodily material” means material which— has come from a human body, and consists of or includes human cells; “existing holding” means bodily material held immediately before the day on which this section comes into force.

Your change, as a redline

45 Non-consensual analysis of DNA

(1) A person commits an offence if— (a) he has any bodily material intending— (i) that any human DNA in the material be analysed without qualifying consent, and (ii) that the results of the analysis be used otherwise than for an excepted purpose, (b) the material is not of a kind excepted under subsection (2), and (c) he does not reasonably believe the material to be of a kind so excepted. (2) Bodily material is excepted if — (a) it is material which has come from the body of a person who died before the day on which this section comes into force and at least one hundred years have elapsed since the date of the person’s death, (b) it is an existing holding and the person who has it is not in possession, and not likely to come into possession, of information from which the individual from whose body the material has come can be identified, or (c) it is an embryo outside the human body. (3) A person guilty of an offence under this section— (a) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum; (b) is liable on conviction on indictment— (i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years, or (ii) to a fine, or (iii) to both. (4) Schedule 4 (which makes provision for the interpretation of “qualifying consent” and “use for an excepted purpose” in subsection (1)(a)) has effect. (5) In this section (and Schedule 4)— “bodily material” means material which— has come from a human body, and consists of or includes human cells; “existing holding” means bodily material held immediately before the day on which this section comes into force.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds